Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26991305›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Risk Factors for Hyperglycaemia in Pregnancy in Tamil Nadu, India.

Karoline Kragelund Nielsen, Peter Damm, Anil Kapur, Vijayam Balaji, Madhuri S Balaji, Veerasamy Seshiah, Ib C Bygbjerg

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Diabetic retinopathy in pregnancy - A review.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Comparison of Maternal and Fetal Outcomes in Parturients With and Without a Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Women & diabetes: Our right to a healthy future.The Indian journal of medical research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Karoline Kragelund NielsenGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter DammCenter for Pregnant Women with Diabetes, Department of Obstetrics, Rigshospitalet, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anil KapurWorld Diabetes Foundation, Gentofte, Denmark.
Vijayam BalajiDr. Seshiah Diabetes Research Institute and Dr. Balaji Diabetes Care Centre, Chennai, India.
Madhuri S BalajiDr. Seshiah Diabetes Research Institute and Dr. Balaji Diabetes Care Centre, Chennai, India.
Veerasamy SeshiahDr. Seshiah Diabetes Research Institute and Dr. Balaji Diabetes Care Centre, Chennai, India.
Ib C BygbjergGlobal Health Section, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHyperglycaemia in pregnancy (HIP), i.e. gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and diabetes in pregnancy (DIP), increases the risk of various short- and long-term adverse outcomes. However, much remains to be understood about the role of different risk factors in development of HIP.

objectiveThe aims of this observational study were to examine the role of potential risk factors for HIP, and to investigate whether any single or accumulated risk factor(s) could be used to predict HIP among women attending GDM screening at three centres in urban, semi-urban and rural Tamil Nadu, India. METHODOLOGY: Pregnant women underwent a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. Data on potential risk factors was collected and analysed using logistical regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values were calculated for significant risk factors and a risk factor scoring variable was constructed.

resultsHIP was prevalent in 18.9% of the study population (16.3% GDM; 2.6% DIP). Increasing age and BMI as well as having a mother only or both parents with diabetes were significant independent risk factors for HIP. Among women attending the rural health centre a doubling of income corresponded to an 80% increased risk of HIP (OR 1.80, 95%CI 1.10-2.93; p = 0.019), whereas it was not significantly associated with HIP among women attending the other health centres. The performance of the individual risk factors and the constructed scoring variable differed substantially between the three health centres, but none of them were good enough to discriminate between those with and without HIP.

conclusionsThe findings highlight the importance of socio-economic circumstances and intergenerational risk transmission in the occurrence of HIP as well as the need for universal screening.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexHyperglycemiaPregnancy ComplicationsAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucose Tolerance TestHumansIndiaPregnancyRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID26991305
PMCPMC4798719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.