Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26991290›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]

Mycobacterium paratuberculosis detection in cow's milk in Argentina by immunomagnetic separation-PCR.

Liliana Rosa Gilardoni, Bárbara Fernández, Claudia Morsella, Laura Mendez, Ana María Jar, Fernando Alberto Paolicchi, Silvia Leonor Mundo

Open access · hybridAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Paratuberculosis in Latin America: a systematic review.Tropical animal health and production · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Detection ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  6. Longitudinal Study ofVeterinary sciences · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Diagnosis of mycobacteria in bovine milk: an overview.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2017
    Review
  9. Magnetic Separation Methods for the Detection ofBioMed research international · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Liliana Rosa GilardoniCátedra de Inmunología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Bárbara FernándezCátedra de Inmunología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Claudia MorsellaLaboratorio de Bacteriología, EEA-INTA Balcarce, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Laura MendezLaboratorio de Bacteriología, EEA-INTA Balcarce, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Ana María JarCátedra de Inmunología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Fernando Alberto PaolicchiLaboratorio de Bacteriología, EEA-INTA Balcarce, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Silvia Leonor MundoCátedra de Inmunología, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Electronic address: smundo@fvet.uba.ar.
University of Buenos Aires · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to standardize a diagnosis procedure to detect Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis (Map) DNA in raw cow milk samples under field conditions. A procedure that combines both immunomagnetic separation and IS900-PCR detection (IMS-IS1 PCR) was employed on milk samples from 265 lactating Holstein cows from Map infected and uninfected herds in Argentina. IMS-IS1 PCR results were analyzed and compared with those obtained from milk and fecal culture and serum ELISA. The extent of agreement between both tests was determined by the Kappa test. IMS-IS1 PCR showed a detection limit of 10(1) CFU of Map/mL of milk, when 50:50 mix of monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies were used to coat magnetic beads. All of the 118 samples from the Map uninfected herds were negative for the set of the tests. In Map infected herds, 80 out of 147 cows tested positive by milk IMS-IS1 PCR (55%), of which 2 (1.4%) were also positive by milk culture, 15 (10%) by fecal culture, and 20 (14%) by serum ELISA. Kappa statistics (95% CI) showed a slight agreement between the different tests (<0.20), and the proportions of agreement were ≤0.55. The IMS-IS1 PCR method detected Map in milk of the cows that were not positive in other techniques. This is the first report dealing with the application of IMS-IS1 PCR in the detection of Map in raw milk samples under field conditions in Argentina.

Indexed as

AnimalsArgentinaCattleCattle DiseasesFecesFemaleImmunomagnetic SeparationLactationMilkMycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosisParatuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionCow's milkImmunomagnetic separationMycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosisPCR

Identifiers

PMID26991290
PMCPMC4874612
OpenAlexW2327722562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.