Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26990995›Full record

ArticleArthritis care & research2016

Association of Improvement in Pain With Therapeutic Response as Determined by Individual Improvement Criteria in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Eva C Scharbatke, Frank Behrens, Marc Schmalzing, Michaela Koehm, Gerd Greger, Holger Gnann, Harald Burkhardt, Hans-Peter Tony

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis care & research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Curcumin: Useful add-on for Rheumatic Diseases?Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Individual therapeutic DAS28-dRheumatology international · 2020
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eva C ScharbatkeSchwerpunkt Rheumatologie/Klinische Immunologie Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Frank BehrensUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, and Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Project Group Translational Medicine & Pharmacology TMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marc SchmalzingSchwerpunkt Rheumatologie/Klinische Immunologie Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Michaela KoehmUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, and Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Project Group Translational Medicine & Pharmacology TMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Gerd GregerAbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Wiesbaden, Germany.
Holger GnannAbteilung Biostatistik, GKM Gesellschaft für Therapieforschung mbH, München, Germany.
Harald BurkhardtUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, and Fraunhofer Institute for Molecular Biology and Applied Ecology IME, Project Group Translational Medicine & Pharmacology TMP, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Hans-Peter TonySchwerpunkt Rheumatologie/Klinische Immunologie Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik II, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany. Tony_H@ukw.de.
University of Würzburg · DEUniversity Hospital Frankfurt · DEAbbVie (Germany) · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo use statistical methods to establish a threshold for individual response in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

methodsWe used an analysis of variance model in patients on stable therapy (discovery cohort) to establish critical differences (d

resultsIn the discovery cohort (n = 700), PROs showed excellent long-term retest reliability. The minimum change that exceeded random fluctuation was conservatively determined to be 3 points for pain, 4 points for fatigue, and 16 points for function. In the treatment cohort (n = 2,788), 1,483 patients (53.2%) achieved a significant individual therapeutic response as assessed by Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28)-d

conclusionThe establishment of critical differences in PROs distinguishes true responses from random variation and provides insights into appropriate patient management.

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresAdalimumabAdultAgedAntirheumatic AgentsArthralgiaArthritis, RheumatoidCohort StudiesDisability EvaluationFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementSeverity of Illness IndexAdalimumabAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID26990995
PMCPMC5129502
OpenAlexW2299605132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.