Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26990978›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Experimental Neuromyelitis Optica Induces a Type I Interferon Signature in the Spinal Cord.

Satoru Oji, Eva-Maria Nicolussi, Nathalie Kaufmann, Bleranda Zeka, Kathrin Schanda, Kazuo Fujihara, Zsolt Illes, Charlotte Dahle, Markus Reindl, Hans Lassmann and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Satoru OjiDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Eva-Maria NicolussiDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Nathalie KaufmannDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Bleranda ZekaDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Kathrin SchandaClinical Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Kazuo FujiharaDepartments of Multiple Sclerosis Therapeutics and Neurology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Zsolt IllesDepartment of Neurology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Charlotte DahleDepartment of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine and Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Markus ReindlClinical Department of Neurology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Hans LassmannDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Monika BradlDepartment of Neuroimmunology, Center for Brain Research, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Medical University of Vienna · ATInnsbruck Medical University · ATLinköping University · SETohoku University · JPUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 25240
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an acute inflammatory disease of the central nervous system (CNS) which predominantly affects spinal cord and optic nerves. Most patients harbor pathogenic autoantibodies, the so-called NMO-IgGs, which are directed against the water channel aquaporin 4 (AQP4) on astrocytes. When these antibodies gain access to the CNS, they mediate astrocyte destruction by complement-dependent and by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. In contrast to multiple sclerosis (MS) patients who benefit from therapies involving type I interferons (I-IFN), NMO patients typically do not profit from such treatments. How is I-IFN involved in NMO pathogenesis? To address this question, we made gene expression profiles of spinal cords from Lewis rat models of experimental neuromyelitis optica (ENMO) and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE). We found an upregulation of I-IFN signature genes in EAE spinal cords, and a further upregulation of these genes in ENMO. To learn whether the local I-IFN signature is harmful or beneficial, we induced ENMO by transfer of CNS antigen-specific T cells and NMO-IgG, and treated the animals with I-IFN at the very onset of clinical symptoms, when the blood-brain barrier was open. With this treatment regimen, we could amplify possible effects of the I-IFN induced genes on the transmigration of infiltrating cells through the blood brain barrier, and on lesion formation and expansion, but could avoid effects of I-IFN on the differentiation of pathogenic T and B cells in the lymph nodes. We observed that I-IFN treated ENMO rats had spinal cord lesions with fewer T cells, macrophages/activated microglia and activated neutrophils, and less astrocyte damage than their vehicle treated counterparts, suggesting beneficial effects of I-IFN.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierB-LymphocytesDisease Models, AnimalEncephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, ExperimentalGene Expression RegulationInterferon Type ILymph NodesMacrophagesMicrogliaNeuromyelitis OpticaNeutrophilsRatsRats, Inbred LewSpinal CordT-LymphocytesInterferon Type I

Identifiers

PMID26990978
PMCPMC4798752
OpenAlexW2327922591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.