Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26990915›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2016

Dose-response association between hepatitis B surface antigen levels and liver cancer risk in Chinese men and women.

Yang Yang, Jing Gao, Hong-Lan Li, Wei Zheng, Gong Yang, Wei Zhang, Xiao Ma, Yu-Ting Tan, Nathaniel Rothman, Yu-Tang Gao and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Biomarkers for Predicting Viral HepatitisAssociated Hepatocellular Carcinoma.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Pre-diagnostic urinary 15-FInternational journal of cancer · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Yang YangSchool of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jing GaoSKLORG, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hong-Lan LiSKLORG, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wei ZhengDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Gong YangDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Wei ZhangSKLORG, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Xiao MaSKLORG, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Ting TanSKLORG, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Nathaniel RothmanDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD.
Yu-Tang GaoSKLORG, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wong-Ho ChowDivision of Cancer Prevention and Population Sciences, Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Xiao-Ou ShuDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Yong-Bing XiangSKLORG, Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Renji Hospital · CNVanderbilt University · USState Key Laboratory of Oncogene and Related Genes · CNFudan University · CNNational Cancer Institute · USShanghai Cancer Institute · CNThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Cohort Study of Cancer inhibitory Factors in MenR01CA082729 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI SHU, XIAO-OU · 2001 to 2011
$6.3M
Shanghai Womens Health StudyUM1CA182910 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHENG, WEI · 2014 to 2018
$5.9M
Shanghai Men's Health StudyUM1CA173640 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHU, XIAO-OU · 2013 to 2017
$4.9M
Cancer Risk Reduction and Diet: A Cohort Study of WomenR37CA070867 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZHENG, WEI · 2009 to 2013
$4.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA082729NCI NIH HHS R37 CA070867NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA173640NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA182910
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed at evaluating the risk of liver cancer in different levels of HBsAg among Chinese men and women. We carried out a nested case-control study including 363 cases and 3,511 controls in two population-based cohorts in Shanghai. Plasma samples collected at enrollment were quantified for HBsAg levels using the Architect QT assay. Conditional logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for liver cancer, with adjustment for potential confounders. HBsAg was detected in 6.29% of control subjects overall (7.02% in men and 4.98% in women). HBsAg levels were positively associated with liver cancer risk in a dose-response manner (ptrend  < 0.001). Such association showed a significant gender disparity. With increasing levels of HBsAg, liver cancer risks rose more steeply in men than in women. In men, the adjusted ORs increased from 7.27 (95% CI: 3.49-15.15) at the lowest detectable level of HBsAg (5-9 IU/ml) to 7.16 (95% CI: 3.21-15.96), 34.30 (95% CI: 16.94-69.44), and 47.33 (95% CI: 23.50-95.34) at the highest level of HBsAg (≥1,000 IU/ml) compared to those negative for HBsAg. The corresponding ORs were much lower for women, from 1.37 (95% CI: 0.25-7.47), 3.81 (95% CI: 1.09-13.28), 7.36 (95% CI: 2.41-22.46) and 16.86 (95% CI: 7.24-39.27), respectively. HBsAg quantification has potential to distinguish individuals at different risks of liver cancer. Men with the lowest detectable level of HBsAg should still pay attention to their liver cancer risks, but those with a higher level may be given a higher priority in future liver cancer surveillance program.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, HepatocellularCase-Control StudiesChinaFemaleHepatitis BHepatitis B Surface AntigensHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioRiskHepatitis B Surface Antigensdose-response relationshipgender disparityHepatitis B surface antigenliver cancerprospective study

Identifiers

PMID26990915
PMCPMC4985528
OpenAlexW2301729783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.