Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26990884›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Evaluation of Presumably Disease Causing SCN1A Variants in a Cohort of Common Epilepsy Syndromes.

Dennis Lal, Eva M Reinthaler, Borislav Dejanovic, Patrick May, Holger Thiele, Anna-Elina Lehesjoki, Günter Schwarz, Erik Riesch, M Arfan Ikram, Cornelia M van Duijn and 21 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Multimodal Analysis ofFrontiers in neurology · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors at 14 institutions in 7 countries.

Dennis LalCologne Center for Genomics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Eva M ReinthalerDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Borislav DejanovicInstitute of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Patrick MayLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Holger ThieleCologne Center for Genomics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Anna-Elina LehesjokiFolkhälsan Institute of Genetics, Helsinki, Finland.
Günter SchwarzInstitute of Biochemistry, Department of Chemistry, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Erik RieschCeGaT GmbH-Centre for Genomics and Transcriptomics, Tübingen, Germany.
M Arfan IkramDepartments of Epidemiology, Neurology, Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Cornelia M van DuijnDepartments of Epidemiology, Neurology, Radiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Andre G UitterlindenDepartment of Epidemiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Albert HofmanDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Hannelore SteinböckPrivate Practice for Pediatrics, Vienna, Austria.
Ursula Gruber-SedlmayrDepartment of Pediatrics, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Birgit NeophytouSt. Anna Children's Hospital, Department of Neuropediatrics, Vienna, Austria.
Federico ZaraLaboratory of Neurogenetics and Neuroscience, Institute G. Gaslini, Genova, Italy.
Andreas HahnDepartment of Neuropediatrics, University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Giessen, Germany.
Genetic Commission of the Italian League against Epilepsy
EuroEPINOMICS CoGIE Consortium
Padhraig GormleyPsychiatric and Neurodevelopmental Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Felicitas BeckerDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Yvonne G WeberDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Maria Roberta CilioDepartments of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Wolfram S KunzDepartment of Epileptology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Roland KrauseLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Fritz ZimprichDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes R LemkeInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Peter NürnbergCologne Center for Genomics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Thomas SanderCologne Center for Genomics, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Holger LercheDepartment of Neurology and Epileptology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Bernd A NeubauerDepartment of Neuropediatrics, University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Giessen, Germany.
University of Cologne · DEErasmus MC · NLBroad Institute · USUniversitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Bonn · DEUniversity of Luxembourg · LUCeGaT (Germany) · DEHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research · DEIstituto Giannina Gaslini · ITMedical University of Graz · ATSt Anna Children's Hospital · ATUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF I 643Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe SCN1A gene, coding for the voltage-gated Na+ channel alpha subunit NaV1.1, is the clinically most relevant epilepsy gene. With the advent of high-throughput next-generation sequencing, clinical laboratories are generating an ever-increasing catalogue of SCN1A variants. Variants are more likely to be classified as pathogenic if they have already been identified previously in a patient with epilepsy. Here, we critically re-evaluate the pathogenicity of this class of variants in a cohort of patients with common epilepsy syndromes and subsequently ask whether a significant fraction of benign variants have been misclassified as pathogenic.

methodsWe screened a discovery cohort of 448 patients with a broad range of common genetic epilepsies and 734 controls for previously reported SCN1A mutations that were assumed to be disease causing. We re-evaluated the evidence for pathogenicity of the identified variants using in silico predictions, segregation, original reports, available functional data and assessment of allele frequencies in healthy individuals as well as in a follow up cohort of 777 patients. RESULTS AND

interpretationWe identified 8 known missense mutations, previously reported as pathogenic, in a total of 17 unrelated epilepsy patients (17/448; 3.80%). Our re-evaluation indicates that 7 out of these 8 variants (p.R27T; p.R28C; p.R542Q; p.R604H; p.T1250M; p.E1308D; p.R1928G; NP_001159435.1) are not pathogenic. Only the p.T1174S mutation may be considered as a genetic risk factor for epilepsy of small effect size based on the enrichment in patients (P = 6.60 x 10-4; OR = 0.32, fishers exact test), previous functional studies but incomplete penetrance. Thus, incorporation of previous studies in genetic counseling of SCN1A sequencing results is challenging and may produce incorrect conclusions.

Indexed as

Mutation, MissenseAmino Acid SubstitutionCase-Control StudiesEpilepsyFemaleHumansMaleNAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelRisk FactorsSyndromeNAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium ChannelSCN1A protein, human

Identifiers

PMID26990884
PMCPMC4798642
OpenAlexW2298138181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.