Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26990661›Full record

ReviewCell death and differentiation2016

The clearance of dying cells: table for two.

D R Green, T H Oguin, J Martinez

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cell death and differentiation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 180 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
180citing papers in PubMed
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

180 citing papers in PubMed, 303 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

120 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

D R GreenDepartment of Immunology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
T H OguinImmunity, Inflammation, and Disease Laboratory, NIH/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
J MartinezImmunity, Inflammation, and Disease Laboratory, NIH/National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

Characterization of the molecular mechanisms of LC3-associated phagocytosis and its role in disease pathogenesisZIAES103286 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MARTINEZ, JENNIFER · 2015 to 2021
$9.2M
Non-canonical functions of autophagy proteinsR01AI040646 · NIAID · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI GREEN, DOUGLAS R. · 1997 to 2023
$8.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI040646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phagocytic cells of the immune system must constantly survey for, recognize, and efficiently clear the billions of cellular corpses that arise as a result of development, stress, infection, or normal homeostasis. This process, termed efferocytosis, is critical for the prevention of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, and persistence of dead cells in tissue is characteristic of many human autoimmune diseases, notably systemic lupus erythematosus. The most notable characteristic of the efferocytosis of apoptotic cells is its 'immunologically silent' response. Although the mechanisms by which phagocytes facilitate engulfment of dead cells has been a well-studied area, the pathways that coordinate to process the ingested corpse and direct the subsequent immune response is an area of growing interest. The recently described pathway of LC3 (microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3)-associated phagocytosis (LAP) has shed some light on this issue. LAP is triggered when an extracellular particle, such as a dead cell, engages an extracellular receptor during phagocytosis, induces the translocation of autophagy machinery, and ultimately LC3 to the cargo-containing phagosome, termed the LAPosome. In this review, we will examine efferocytosis and the impact of LAP on efferocytosis, allowing us to reimagine the impact of the autophagy machinery on innate host defense mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoptosisAutoimmune DiseasesAutophagy-Related ProteinsCytokinesHumansInflammationMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsPhagocytesPhagocytosisReactive Oxygen SpeciesSignal TransductionAutophagy-Related ProteinsCytokinesMicrotubule-Associated ProteinsReactive Oxygen Species

Identifiers

PMID26990661
PMCPMC4987729
OpenAlexW2297172779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.