Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26990501›Full record

ArticleCytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology2016

flowClean: Automated identification and removal of fluorescence anomalies in flow cytometry data.

Kipper Fletez-Brant, Josef Špidlen, Ryan R Brinkman, Mario Roederer, Pratip K Chattopadhyay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Guidelines for Gating Flow Cytometry Data for Immunological Assays.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Assessment of Biocontainment Efficacy and Flow Cytometric Impact of a Novel Platform in High Containment Laboratories.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Computational Methods for Single-Cell Proteomics.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2023
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kipper Fletez-BrantMcKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine and Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Josef ŠpidlenTerry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Ryan R BrinkmanTerry Fox Laboratory, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, Canada.
Mario RoedererVaccine Research Center, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Pratip K ChattopadhyayVaccine Research Center, National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Disease, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Flow Cytometry CoreZICAI005101 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI ROEDERER, MARIO · 2009 to 2025
$25.7M
Development Of Flow Cytometric Technologies For Immune AssaysZIAAI005020 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI ROEDERER, MARIO · 2009 to 2019
$9.6M
The Statistical and Computational Analysis of Flow Cytometry DataR01EB008400 · NIBIB · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI GOTTARDO, RAPHAEL · 2008 to 2015
$2.9M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 AI999999NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB008400
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern flow cytometry systems can be coupled to plate readers for high-throughput acquisition. These systems allow hundreds of samples to be analyzed in a single day. Quality control of the data remains challenging, however, and is further complicated when a large number of parameters is measured in an experiment. Our examination of 29,228 publicly available FCS files from laboratories worldwide indicates 13.7% have a fluorescence anomaly. In particular, fluorescence measurements for a sample over the collection time may not remain stable due to fluctuations in fluid dynamics; the impact of instabilities may differ between samples and among parameters. Therefore, we hypothesized that tracking cell populations (which represent a summary of all parameters) in centered log ratio space would provide a sensitive and consistent method of quality control. Here, we present flowClean, an algorithm to track subset frequency changes within a sample during acquisition, and flag time periods with fluorescence perturbations leading to the emergence of false populations. Aberrant time periods are reported as a new parameter and added to a revised data file, allowing users to easily review and exclude those events from further analysis. We apply this method to proof-of-concept datasets and also to a subset of data from a recent vaccine trial. The algorithm flags events that are suspicious by visual inspection, as well as those showing more subtle effects that might not be consistently flagged by investigators reviewing the data manually, and out-performs the current state-of-the-art. flowClean is available as an R package on Bioconductor, as a module on the free-to-use GenePattern web server, and as a plugin for FlowJo X. © 2016 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCell TrackingDatasets as TopicFlow CytometryFluorescenceHumansQuality Controlautomatedflow cytometryhigh throughputquality control

Identifiers

PMID26990501
PMCPMC5522377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.