Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26990374›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2016

Does cigarette reduction while using nicotine replacement therapy prior to a quit attempt predict abstinence following quit date?

Nicola Lindson-Hawley, Bethany Shinkins, Robert West, Susan Michie, Paul Aveyard

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Smoking reduction interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Preloading With Nicotine Replacement Therapy in People With HIV Who Smoke: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicola Lindson-HawleyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Bethany ShinkinsNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Robert WestUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Susan MichieUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Paul AveyardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBUK Centre for Tobacco & Alcohol Studies · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/08/047/25082Cancer Research UK 14135Department of Health 09/110/01Medical Research Council MR/K023195/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPrevious studies have reported that people who use a smoking cessation medication while smoking and reduce cigarette consumption spontaneously are three times more likely to stop smoking after a quit date. The aim was to replicate this and assess whether it arises because of willed effortful reduction rather than unwilled reduced drive to smoke caused by medication.

designSecondary analysis of a trial where participants were randomised to smoke as normal or reduce by 75% over 2 weeks prior to quit date, using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in both arms.

settingThirty-one UK primary care practices.

participantsA total of 517 adult smokers seeking quitting support in the carbon monoxide (CO) analyses and 421 in the cigarettes/day analyses. MEASUREMENTS: Russell Standard abstinence was recorded 4 weeks after quit date. The randomized groups were combined and the association between reduction and abstinence examined. The second analysis assessed whether this association differed by whether smokers were, or were not, instructed to reduce.

findingsIn all participants, there was no evidence that reducing cigarettes/day or CO by at least half compared with not reducing predicted abstinence at 4 weeks [risk ratio (RR) = 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.68-1.14 and RR = 1.20; 95% CI = 1.00-1.44, respectively]. However, in smokers instructed to reduce, CO reduction was associated with 4-week abstinence (RR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.16-2.00), but not among people advised not to reduce (RR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.67-1.24).

conclusionsSmoking reduction prior to a target quit date while on a smoking cessation medication may only predict subsequent abstinence when smokers are consciously attempting to reduce.

Indexed as

Tobacco Use Cessation DevicesAdultAgedBreath TestsCarbon MonoxideFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CarePrognosisSmokingSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsTobacco SmokingUnited KingdomCarbon MonoxideNRTobservationalRCTReductionsmoking cessationtobacco addiction

Identifiers

PMID26990374
PMCPMC4913737
OpenAlexW2300793828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.