ArticleAnnals of human genetics2016
Joint Analysis of Multiple Traits in Rare Variant Association Studies.
Article in Annals of human genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A computationally efficient clustering linear combination approach to jointly analyze multiple phenotypes for GWAS.PloS one · 2022Article
- Associating Multivariate Traits with Genetic Variants Using Collapsing and Kernel Methods with Pedigree- or Population-Based Studies.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- A fast and powerful aggregated Cauchy association test for joint analysis of multiple phenotypes.Genes & genomics · 2021Article
- Comparison ofFrontiers in genetics · 2019Article
- Association analysis of multiple traits by an approach of combining P values.Journal of genetics · 2018Article
- Association analysis of rare and common variants with multiple traits based on variable reduction method.Genetics research · 2018Article
- Testing an optimally weighted combination of common and/or rare variants with multiple traits.PloS one · 2018Article
- A novel method to test associations between a weighted combination of phenotypes and genetic variants.PloS one · 2018Article
- Statistical methods to detect pleiotropy in human complex traits.Open biology · 2017Review
- An Adaptive Fisher's Combination Method for Joint Analysis of Multiple Phenotypes in Association Studies.Scientific reports · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The joint analysis of multiple traits has recently become popular since it can increase statistical power to detect genetic variants and there is increasing evidence showing that pleiotropy is a widespread phenomenon in complex diseases. Currently, the majority of existing methods for the joint analysis of multiple traits test association between one common variant and multiple traits. However, the variant-by-variant methods for common variant association studies may not be optimal for rare variant association studies due to the allelic heterogeneity as well as the extreme rarity of individual variants. Current statistical methods for rare variant association studies are for one single trait only. In this paper, we propose an adaptive weighting reverse regression (AWRR) method to test association between multiple traits and rare variants in a genomic region. AWRR is robust to the directions of effects of causal variants and is also robust to the directions of association of traits. Using extensive simulation studies, we compare the performance of AWRR with canonical correlation analysis (CCA), Single-TOW, and the weighted sum reverse regression (WSRR). Our results show that, in all of the simulation scenarios, AWRR is consistently more powerful than CCA. In most scenarios, AWRR is more powerful than Single-TOW and WSRR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.