Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26990299›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Xpert®MTB/RIF for the Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in a Remote Arctic Setting: Impact on Cost and Time to Treatment Initiation.

Olivia Oxlade, Jordan Sugarman, Gonzalo G Alvarez, Madhukar Pai, Kevin Schwartzman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Addressing tuberculosis among Inuit in Canada.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2018
    Article
  6. The use of technology to improve health care to Saskatchewan's First Nations communities.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia OxladeRespiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Jordan SugarmanRespiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Gonzalo G AlvarezClinical Epidemiology, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Madhukar PaiRespiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Kevin SchwartzmanRespiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Research Unit, Department of Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
McGill University · CAOttawa Hospital · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP 89918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) remains a significant health problem in the Canadian Arctic. Substantial health system delays in TB diagnosis can occur, in part due to the lack of capacity for onsite microbiologic testing. A study recently evaluated the yield and impact of a rapid automated PCR test (Xpert®MTB/RIF) for the diagnosis of TB in Iqaluit (Nunavut). We conducted an economic analysis to evaluate the expected cost relative to the expected reduction in time to treatment initiation, with the addition of Xpert®MTB/RIF to the current diagnostic and treatment algorithms used in this setting.

methodsA decision analysis model compared current microbiologic testing to a scenario where Xpert®MTB/RIF was added to the current diagnostic algorithm for active TB, and incorporated costs and clinical endpoints from the Iqaluit study. Several sensitivity analyses that considered alternative use were also considered. We estimated days to TB diagnosis and treatment initiation, health system costs, and the incremental cost per treatment day gained for each individual evaluated for possible TB.

resultsWith the addition of Xpert®MTB/RIF, costs increased while days to TB treatment initiation were reduced. The incremental cost per treatment day gained (per individual investigated for TB) was $164 (95% uncertainty range $85, $452). In a sensitivity analysis that considered hospital discharge after a single negative Xpert®MTB/RIF, the Xpert®MTB/RIF scenario was cost saving.

interpretationAdding Xpert®MTB/RIF to the current diagnostic algorithm for TB in Nunavut appears to reduce time to diagnosis and treatment at reasonable cost. It may be especially well suited to overcome some of the other logistical barriers that are unique to this and other remote communities.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsArctic RegionsCost of IllnessHealth Services AccessibilityHumansNunavutProbabilitySensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosisAntitubercular Agents

Identifiers

PMID26990299
PMCPMC4798714
OpenAlexW2299953426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.