Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26990020›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cellular and molecular medicine2016

Growth differentiation factor 15 is a promising diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in colorectal cancer.

Chen Li, Xiaobing Wang, Ignacio Casal, Jingyu Wang, Peiwei Li, Wei Zhang, Enping Xu, Maode Lai, Honghe Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cellular and molecular medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Mitochondrial dysfunction, UPRCell & bioscience · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Prognostic Impact of Serum Growth Differentiation Factor 15 Level in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chen LiDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xiaobing WangMedical Center for Tumor Detection, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Ignacio CasalDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas (CIB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
Jingyu WangDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Peiwei LiDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Zhejiang University School of Public Health, Hangzhou, China.
Wei ZhangMedical Center for Tumor Detection, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Enping XuDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Maode LaiDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Honghe ZhangDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Zhejiang University · CNChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNCentro de Investigaciones Biológicas Margarita Salas · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although various studies have demonstrated that growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) might be a potential diagnostic and prognostic marker in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, the results are inconsistent and the statistical power of individual studies is also insufficient. An original study was conducted to explore the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum GDF15 in CRC patients. We also conducted a meta-analysis study which aimed to summarize the diagnostic and prognostic performance of serum GDF15 in CRC. We searched PubMed and ISI Web of Knowledge up to 1 November 2014 for eligible studies. In order to explore the diagnostic performance of GDF15, standardized mean difference (SMD) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed. For prognostic meta-analysis, study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of serum GDF15 for survival were summarized. A total of eight studies were included in the meta-analyses. Our results revealed that serum GDF15 levels in CRC patients were higher than those in healthy controls (SMD = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.56-1.59, P < 0.001). For discriminating CRC from healthy controls, the AUC of GDF15 was 0.816 (95% CI: 0.792-0.838). The sensitivity and specificity were 58.9% (95% CI: 55.0-62.8) and 92.08% (95% CI: 89.2-94.4), respectively, when a cut-off value of 1099 pg/ml was established. Besides, higher GDF15 expression level was associated with worse overall survival for CRC patients (pooled HR = 2.09, 95% CI: 1.47-2.96). In conclusion, the present meta-analysis suggests that serum GDF15 may be a useful diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for CRC.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesColorectal NeoplasmsGrowth Differentiation Factor 15HumansKaplan-Meier EstimatePrognosisPublication BiasROC CurveBiomarkers, TumorGrowth Differentiation Factor 15colorectal cancerdiagnosticgrowth differentiation factor 15meta-analysisprognostic

Identifiers

PMID26990020
PMCPMC4956952
OpenAlexW2300050735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.