Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26989808›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of haematology2016

Allogeneic transplantation provides durable remission in a subset of DLBCL patients relapsing after autologous transplantation.

Timothy S Fenske, Kwang W Ahn, Tara M Graff, Alyssa DiGilio, Qaiser Bashir, Rammurti T Kamble, Ernesto Ayala, Ulrike Bacher, Jonathan E Brammer, Mitchell Cairo and 20 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of haematology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Provides Durable Remission in Patients with Primary Mediastinal Large B Cell Lymphoma.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2019
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Outcomes after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Double-Hit and Double-Expressor Lymphoma.Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · 2018
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Timothy S FenskeFroedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Kwang W AhnDepartment of Medicine, CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Tara M GraffMedical Oncology Hematology Associates, Des Moines, IA, USA.
Alyssa DiGilioDepartment of Medicine, CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Qaiser BashirDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Rammurti T KambleDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Ernesto AyalaDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Ulrike BacherDepartment of Haematology/Oncology, University Medicine Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Jonathan E BrammerDepartment of Stem Cell Transplantation, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Mitchell CairoDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology and Stem Cell Transplantation, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA.
Andy ChenCenter for Hematologic Malignancies, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Yi-Bin ChenDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Saurabh ChhabraDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Anita D'SouzaDepartment of Medicine, CIBMTR (Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research), Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Umar FarooqDepartment of Oncology and Blood Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Cesar FreytesSouth Texas Veterans Health Care System and University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Siddhartha GangulyBlood and Marrow Transplantation, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Mark HertzbergDepartment of Haematology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
David InwardsDivision of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Samantha JaglowskiDivision of Hematology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
Mohamed A Kharfan-DabajaDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
Hillard M LazarusSeidman Cancer Center, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Sunita NathanDepartment of Hematology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Attaphol PawarodeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Miguel-Angel PeralesDepartment of Medicine, Adult Bone Marrow Transplantation Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Nishitha ReddyDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Sachiko SeoVaccine and Infectious Diseases Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Anna SuredaServei d'Hematologia, Institut Catala d'Oncologia, Hospital Duran I Reynals, Barcelona, Spain.
Sonali M SmithSection of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mehdi HamadaniFroedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Microenvironment and Cancer ImmunologyP30CA030199 · NCI · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI Michael Jackson · 1985 to 2026
$107.2M
Data Resource for Analyzing Blood &Marrow TransplantsU24CA076518 · NCI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI Amy M Moskop, Bronwen Shaw · 1998 to 2026
$105.2M
Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Easy-to-read Informed Consent for HCT Clinical TrialsU10HL069294 · NHLBI · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI HOROWITZ, MARY MARESCA · 2011 to 2016
$43.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS U24 CA076518NHLBI NIH HHS U10 HL069294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients progressing after autologous haematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT), allogeneic HCT (alloHCT) is often considered, although limited information is available to guide patient selection. Using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) database, we identified 503 patients who underwent alloHCT after disease progression/relapse following a prior autoHCT. The 3-year probabilities of non-relapse mortality, progression/relapse, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 30, 38, 31 and 37% respectively. Factors associated with inferior PFS on multivariate analysis included Karnofsky performance status (KPS) <80, chemoresistance, autoHCT to alloHCT interval <1-year and myeloablative conditioning. Factors associated with worse OS on multivariate analysis included KPS<80, chemoresistance and myeloablative conditioning. Three adverse prognostic factors were used to construct a prognostic model for PFS, including KPS<80 (4 points), autoHCT to alloHCT interval <1-year (2 points) and chemoresistant disease at alloHCT (5 points). This CIBMTR prognostic model classified patients into four groups: low-risk (0 points), intermediate-risk (2-5 points), high-risk (6-9 points) or very high-risk (11 points), predicting 3-year PFS of 40, 32, 11 and 6%, respectively, with 3-year OS probabilities of 43, 39, 19 and 11% respectively. In conclusion, the CIBMTR prognostic model identifies a subgroup of DLBCL patients experiencing long-term survival with alloHCT after a failed prior autoHCT.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDrug ResistanceHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMiddle AgedMyeloablative AgonistsPrognosisRecurrenceRemission InductionRisk AssessmentSurvival RateTransplantation, AutologousMyeloablative Agonistsallogeneic transplantationDLBCLprior autologous transplanprognostic score

Identifiers

PMID26989808
PMCPMC4940282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.