Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26989783›Full record

ReviewScience advances2016

Reconsidering plant memory: Intersections between stress recovery, RNA turnover, and epigenetics.

Peter A Crisp, Diep Ganguly, Steven R Eichten, Justin O Borevitz, Barry J Pogson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Science advances, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 263 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
263citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

263 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Unlocking the future of crop improvement with crop wild relatives.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Dehydration Stress Memory Genes in Tomato (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

203 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Peter A CrispAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University Canberra, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3655-0130
Diep GangulyAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University Canberra, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6746-0181
Steven R EichtenAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University Canberra, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia.
Justin O BorevitzAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University Canberra, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia.
Barry J PogsonAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, Research School of Biology, Australian National University Canberra, Acton, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants grow in dynamic environments where they can be exposed to a multitude of stressful factors, all of which affect their development, yield, and, ultimately, reproductive success. Plants are adept at rapidly acclimating to stressful conditions and are able to further fortify their defenses by retaining memories of stress to enable stronger or more rapid responses should an environmental perturbation recur. Indeed, one mechanism that is often evoked regarding environmental memories is epigenetics. Yet, there are relatively few examples of such memories; neither is there a clear understanding of their duration, considering the plethora of stresses in nature. We propose that this field would benefit from investigations into the processes and mechanisms enabling recovery from stress. An understanding of stress recovery could provide fresh insights into when, how, and why environmental memories are created and regulated. Stress memories may be maladaptive, hindering recovery and affecting development and potential yield. In some circumstances, it may be advantageous for plants to learn to forget. Accordingly, the recovery process entails a balancing act between resetting and memory formation. During recovery, RNA metabolism, posttranscriptional gene silencing, and RNA-directed DNA methylation have the potential to play key roles in resetting the epigenome and transcriptome and in altering memory. Exploration of this emerging area of research is becoming ever more tractable with advances in genomics, phenomics, and high-throughput sequencing methodology that will enable unprecedented profiling of high-resolution stress recovery time series experiments and sampling of large natural populations.

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticExoribonucleasesModels, BiologicalPlant Physiological PhenomenaRNA, MessengerRNA, PlantRNA StabilityStress, PhysiologicalExoribonucleasesRNA, MessengerRNA, Plantabiotic stressarabidopsisDNA methylationepigeneticsgene silencingplant memoryplantsRNA metabolismRNA turnoverstress recovery

Identifiers

PMID26989783
PMCPMC4788475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.