Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26989704›Full record

ArticleReports of biochemistry & molecular biology2012

Investigation of DNA integration into reproductive organs following intramuscular injection of DNA in mice.

Fatemeh Vahedi, Najmeh Nazari, Shirin Arbabi, Yasser Peymanfar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of biochemistry & molecular biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 82% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Lessons learned from COVID-19 pandemic: Vaccine platform is a key player.Process biochemistry (Barking, London, England) · 2023
    Article
  2. COVID-19 vaccine platforms: Delivering on a promise?Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fatemeh VahediRazi Vaccine & Serum Research Institute, Mashhad, Iran.
Najmeh NazariBiochemistry Department, Payam-e-Noor University, Mashhad, Iran.
Shirin ArbabiBiochemistry Department, Payam-e-Noor University, Mashhad, Iran.
Yasser PeymanfarRazi Vaccine & Serum Research Institute, Mashhad, Iran.
Payame Noor University · IRRazi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDNA immunization with plasmid DNA encoding bacterial, viral, parasitic, and tumor antigens has been reported to trigger protective immunity. The use of plasmid DNA vaccinations against many diseases has produced promising results in animal and human clinical trials; however, safety concerns about the use of DNA vaccines exist, such as the possibility of integration into the host genome, and elicitation of adverse immune responses.

methodsIn this study, we examined the potential integration and bio-distribution of pcDNA3.1+PA, a new vaccine candidate with GenBank accession # EF550208, encoding the PA63 gene, in reproductive organs of mice; ovaries and uterus in female, and testis in male. Animals of both sexes were injected intramuscularly with pcDNA3.1+PA. Host genome integration and tissue distribution were examined using PCR and RT-PCR two times monthly for six months.

resultsRT-PCR confirmed that pcDNA3.1+PA was not integrated into the host genome and did not enter reproductive organs.

conclusionsThis finding has important implications for the use of pcDNA3.1+PA plasmid as a vaccine and opens new perspectives in the DNA vaccine area.

Indexed as

DNAIntegrationIntramuscular injectionMiceReproductive organs

Identifiers

PMID26989704
PMCPMC4757076
OpenAlexW2292479985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.