Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26989364›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology2016

Post-Operative Pain Management in Patients Undergoing Robotic Urological Surgery.

Sian E Batley, Venkat Prasad, Nikhil Vasdev, Gowrie Mohan-S

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03824808 (A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion to Decrease Pain Scores and Opioid Consumption After Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy and Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03824808 phase4terminatednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial Evaluating the Use of Perioperative Intravenous Lidocaine Infusion to Decrease Pain Scores and Opioid Consumption After Robotic-Assisted Prostatectomy and Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Missouri-ColumbiaRan2019 to 2020Enrolled21ConditionsKidney Cancer, Prostate CancerArmsLidocaine Hydrochloride 0.8% in Dextrose 5% Solution, 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sian E BatleyDepartment of Anesthetics, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Venkat PrasadDepartment of Anesthetics, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Nikhil VasdevHertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Gowrie Mohan-SDepartment of Anesthetics, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Robotic urological surgery is being increasingly performed worldwide. The main focus currently is on the operative technique but post operative patient care is an essential part of the process to make this technique safe and successful. We present a review on multiple analgesic techniques available to prevent and treat pain specifically caused after by urological robotic surgery; this article will explain the mechanism of pain pathways involved in laparoscopic procedures and review current evidence pertaining to systemic and regional analgesia methods.

Indexed as

Enhanced recoveryPain managementRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID26989364
PMCPMC4789944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.