Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26989363›Full record

ReviewCurrent urology2016

Effect of Pneumoperitoneum on Renal Function and Physiology in Patients Undergoing Robotic Renal Surgery.

Serena Sodha, Scarlet Nazarian, James M Adshead, Nikhil Vasdev, Gowrie Mohan-S

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current urology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Improving Patient Outcomes in Abdominal Surgery.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Challenges for anaesthesia for robotic-assisted surgery in the elderly: A narrative review.European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serena SodhaDepartment of Anaesthetics, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Scarlet NazarianHertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
James M AdsheadHertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Nikhil VasdevHertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Gowrie Mohan-SHertfordshire and South Bedfordshire Robotic Urological Cancer Centre, Lister Hospital, Stevenage, UK.
Lister Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic and minimally-invasive robotic access has transformed the delivery of urological surgery. While associated with numerous desirable outcomes including shorter post-operative stay and faster return to preoperative function, these techniques have also been associated with increased morbidity such as reduced renal blood flow and post-operative renal dysfunction. The mechanisms leading to these renal effects complex and multifactorial, and have not been fully elucidated. However they are likely to include direct effects from raised intra-abdominal pressure, and indirect effects secondary to carbon dioxide absorption, neuroendocrine factors and tissue damage from oxidative stress. This review summarises these factors, and highlights the need for further work in this area, to direct novel therapies and guide alterations in technique with the aim of reducing renal dysfunction post-laparoscopic and robotic surgery.

Indexed as

NeuroendocrineOxidative stressPneumoperitoneumRenal blood flowRenal dysfunction

Identifiers

PMID26989363
PMCPMC4789951
OpenAlexW2341338997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.