Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26989056›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of membrane biology2016

Net Fluorescein Flux Across Corneal Endothelium Strongly Suggests Fluid Transport is due to Electro-osmosis.

J M Sanchez, V Cacace, C F Kusnier, R Nelson, A A Rubashkin, P Iserovich, J Fischbarg

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of membrane biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

J M SanchezColumbia University, New York, USA.
V CacaceININCA, Conicet, Marcelo T. de Alvear 2270, CP 1122AAJ, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
C F KusnierININCA, Conicet, Marcelo T. de Alvear 2270, CP 1122AAJ, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
R NelsonPDE solutions, California, USA.
A A RubashkinInstitute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Science, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
P IserovichSUNY Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
J FischbargININCA, Conicet, Marcelo T. de Alvear 2270, CP 1122AAJ, Buenos Aires, Argentina. jf20@columbia.edu.
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARColumbia University · USInstitute of Cytology · RUSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University · US

Funding

TRANSPORT MECHANISMS IN CORNEAL ENDOTHELIUMR01EY006178 · NEI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI FISCHBARG, JORGE · 1986 to 2004
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY006178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have presented prior evidence suggesting that fluid transport results from electro-osmosis at the intercellular junctions of the corneal endothelium. Such phenomenon ought to drag other extracellular solutes. We have investigated this using fluorescein-Na2 as an extracellular marker. We measured unidirectional fluxes across layers of cultured human corneal endothelial (HCE) cells. SV-40-transformed HCE layers were grown to confluence on permeable membrane inserts. The medium was DMEM with high glucose and no phenol red. Fluorescein-labeled medium was placed either on the basolateral or the apical side of the inserts; the other side carried unlabeled medium. The inserts were held in a CO2 incubator for 1 h (at 37 °C), after which the entire volume of the unlabeled side was collected. After that, label was placed on the opposite side, and the corresponding paired sample was collected after another hour. Fluorescein counts were determined with a (Photon Technology) DeltaScan fluorometer (excitation 380 nm; emission 550 nm; 2 nm bwth). Samples were read for 60 s. The cells utilized are known to transport fluid from the basolateral to the apical side, just as they do in vivo in several species. We used 4 inserts for influx and efflux (total: 20 1-h periods). We found a net flux of fluorescein from the basolateral to the apical side. The flux ratio was 1.104 ± 0.056. That difference was statistically significant (p = 0.00006, t test, paired samples). The endothelium has a definite restriction at the junctions. Hence, an asymmetry in unidirectional fluxes cannot arise from osmosis, and can only point instead to paracellular solvent drag. We suggest, once more, that such drag is due to electro-osmotic coupling at the paracellular junctions.

Indexed as

Electrophysiological PhenomenaOsmosisBiological TransportBody FluidsCell Membrane PermeabilityEndothelium, CornealFluoresceinHumansModels, BiologicalFluoresceinElectro-osmosisFluid transportLeaky epithelia

Identifiers

PMID26989056
PMCPMC4942490
OpenAlexW2296775886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.