Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26989049›Full record

ArticleThe Prostate2016

The clinical phenotype of hereditary versus sporadic prostate cancer: HPC definition revisited.

Ruben G Cremers, Katja K Aben, Inge M van Oort, J P Michiel Sedelaar, Hans F Vasen, Sita H Vermeulen, Lambertus A Kiemeney

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Prostate, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ruben G CremersRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Katja K AbenRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Inge M van OortRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J P Michiel SedelaarRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hans F VasenThe Netherlands Foundation for the Detection of Hereditary Tumours, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sita H VermeulenRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lambertus A KiemeneyRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLNetherlands Consortium for Healthy Ageing · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe definition of hereditary prostate cancer (HPC) is based on family history and age at onset. Intuitively, HPC is a serious subtype of prostate cancer but there are only limited data on the clinical phenotype of HPC. Here, we aimed to compare the prognosis of HPC to the sporadic form of prostate cancer (SPC).

methodsHPC patients were identified through a national registry of HPC families in the Netherlands, selecting patients diagnosed from the year 2000 onward (n = 324). SPC patients were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR) between 2003 and 2006 for a population-based study into the genetic susceptibility of PC (n = 1,664). Detailed clinical data were collected by NCR-registrars, using a standardized registration form. Follow-up extended up to the end of 2013. Differences between the groups were evaluated by cross-tabulations and tested for statistical significance while accounting for familial dependency of observations by GEE. Differences in progression-free and overall survival were evaluated using χ(2) testing with GEE in a proportional-hazards model.

resultsHPC patients were on average 3 years younger at diagnosis, had lower PSA values, lower Gleason scores, and more often locally confined disease. Of the HPC patients, 35% had high-risk disease (NICE-criteria) versus 51% of the SPC patients. HPC patients were less often treated with active surveillance. Kaplan-Meier 5-year progression-free survival after radical prostatectomy was comparable for HPC (78%) and SPC (74%; P = 0.30). The 5-year overall survival was 85% (95%CI 81-89%) for HPC versus 80% (95%CI 78-82%) for SPC (P = 0.03).

conclusionsHPC has a favorable clinical phenotype but patients more often underwent radical treatment. The major limitation of HPC is the absence of a genetics-based definition of HPC, which may lead to over-diagnosis of PC in men with a family history of prostate cancer. The HPC definition should, therefore, be re-evaluated, aiming at a reduction of over-diagnosis and overtreatment among men with multiple relatives diagnosed with PC. Prostate 76:897-904, 2016. © 2016 The Authors. The Prostate published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AgedAge FactorsDisease-Free SurvivalGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPhenotypePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsRegistriesSurvival RateProstate-Specific Antigenclinical characteristicsfamily historyhereditary prostate cancerphenotypeprostate cancer

Identifiers

PMID26989049
PMCPMC5069637
OpenAlexW2300944462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.