ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2016
A Model of Organizational Context and Shared Decision Making: Application to LGBT Racial and Ethnic Minority Patients.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Use of Decision Aids with Minority Patients: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Pooled it
- Development of a Conceptual Framework for Understanding Shared Decision making Among African-American LGBT Patients and their Clinicians.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Pooled it
- PeriOperative Quality Initiative consensus statement recommendations on the definitions, aims and delivery of shared decision-making for major surgery.Anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Factors Influencing Shared Decision-Making Between Healthcare Providers and Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer People of Color About Intimate Partner Violence.Journal of interpersonal violence · 2025Article
- Weight-Based Health Care Discrimination and Cervical Cancer Screening Among Black Sexual and Gender Minoritized Assigned Female at Birth Adults in the United States.Health equity · 2025Article
- Lack of Informed and Affirming Healthcare for Sexual Minority Men: A Call for Patient-Centered Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024Article
- Promoting equitable sexual health communication among patients with minoritized racial/ethnic, sexual orientation, and gender identities: Strategies, challenges, and opportunities.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2024Article
- Assessing widening disparities in HbA1c and systolic blood pressure retesting during the COVID-19 pandemic in an LGBTQ+-focused federally qualified health center in Chicago: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2022Article
- Assessing the environment for engagement in health services: The Audit for Consumer Engagement (ACE) tool.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022Article
- Advance Care Planning Experiences Among Sexual and Gender Minority People.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Experiences of and resistance to multiple discrimination in health care settings among transmasculine people of color.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- A Content Analysis of Osteopaths' Attitudes for a More Inclusive Clinical Practice towards Transgender People.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- "Making a Way Out of No Way:" Understanding the Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Experiences of Transmasculine Young Adults of Color in the United States.Qualitative health research · 2022Article
- Sexual Health Information Sources, Needs, and Preferences of Young Adult Sexual Minority Cisgender Women and Non-Binary Individuals Assigned Female at Birth.Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP · 2021Article
- Current Capacity and Future Implementation of Mental Health Services in U.S. LGBTQ Community Centers.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2021Article
- Concordance and Patient-Centered Care in Medicaid Enrollees' Care Experience With Providers.Journal of patient experience · 2021Article
- Teaching Intersectionality of Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity, and Race/Ethnicity in a Health Disparities Course.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2020Article
- Sexual Orientation Identity Disparities in Mammography Among White, Black, and Latina U.S. Women.LGBT health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Shared decision making (SDM) occurs when patients and clinicians work together to reach care decisions that are both medically sound and responsive to patients' preferences and values. SDM is an important tenet of patient-centered care that can improve patient outcomes. Patients with multiple minority identities, such as sexual orientation and race/ethnicity, are at particular risk for poor SDM. Among these dual-minority patients, added challenges to clear and open communication include cultural barriers, distrust, and a health care provider's lack of awareness of the patient's minority sexual orientation or gender identity. However, organizational factors like a culture of inclusion and private space throughout the visit can improve SDM with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender ("LGBT") racial/ethnic minority patients who have faced stigma and discrimination. Most models of shared decision making focus on the patient-provider interaction, but the health care organization's context is also critical. Context-an organization's structure and operations-can strongly influence the ability and willingness of patients and clinicians to engage in shared decision making. SDM is most likely to be optimal if organizations transform their contexts and patients and providers improve their communication. Thus, we propose a conceptual model that suggests ways in which organizations can shape their contextual structure and operations to support SDM. The model contains six drivers: workflows, health information technology, organizational structure and culture, resources and clinic environment, training and education, and incentives and disincentives. These drivers work through four mechanisms to impact care: continuity and coordination, the ease of SDM, knowledge and skills, and attitudes and beliefs. These mechanisms can activate clinicians and patients to engage in high-quality SDM. We provide examples of how specific contextual changes could make SDM more effective for LGBT racial/ethnic minority populations, focusing especially on transformations that would establish a safe environment, build trust, and decrease stigma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.