Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26988927›Full record

ArticleStatistical methods in medical research2018

Sample size determinations for stepped-wedge clinical trials from a three-level data hierarchy perspective.

Moonseong Heo, Namhee Kim, Michael L Rinke, Judith Wylie-Rosett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical methods in medical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Moonseong Heo1 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Namhee Kim2 Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Michael L Rinke3 Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Judith Wylie-Rosett1 Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.

Funding

WORD PROCESSORP30CA013330 · NCI · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI THOMAS E ROHAN · 1985 to 2026
$111.2M
Translational Research CoreP30DK020541 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI STREAMSON C CHUA · 2015 to 2026
$27.7M
Core-010UL1TR001073 · NCATS · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI KELLER, MARLA J, SHAMOON, HARRY · 2013 to 2017
$21.3M
CTSA INFRASTRUCTURE FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR025750 · NCRR · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SHAMOON, HARRY · 2008 to 2011
$20.5M
Wellness Program Implementation: School & Student ToolkitsR01DK097096 · NIDDK · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI WYLIE-ROSETT, JUDITH · 2013 to 2016
$2.7M
Reducing Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care PediatricsR01HS023608 · AHRQ · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE, INC · PI RINKE, MICHAEL L · 2014 to 2017
$986k
AHRQ HHS R01 HS023608NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001073NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013330NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR025750NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020541NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK097096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stepped-wedge (SW) designs have been steadily implemented in a variety of trials. A SW design typically assumes a three-level hierarchical data structure where participants are nested within times or periods which are in turn nested within clusters. Therefore, statistical models for analysis of SW trial data need to consider two correlations, the first and second level correlations. Existing power functions and sample size determination formulas had been derived based on statistical models for two-level data structures. Consequently, the second-level correlation has not been incorporated in conventional power analyses. In this paper, we derived a closed-form explicit power function based on a statistical model for three-level continuous outcome data. The power function is based on a pooled overall estimate of stratified cluster-specific estimates of an intervention effect. The sampling distribution of the pooled estimate is derived by applying a fixed-effect meta-analytic approach. Simulation studies verified that the derived power function is unbiased and can be applicable to varying number of participants per period per cluster. In addition, when data structures are assumed to have two levels, we compare three types of power functions by conducting additional simulation studies under a two-level statistical model. In this case, the power function based on a sampling distribution of a marginal, as opposed to pooled, estimate of the intervention effect performed the best. Extensions of power functions to binary outcomes are also suggested.

Indexed as

Clinical Trial Protocols as TopicBiostatisticsCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationCross-Over StudiesData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansLikelihood FunctionsModels, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSample Sizedesign effecteffect sizesample sizestatistical powerStepped-wedge designthree level data

Identifiers

PMID26988927
PMCPMC5026912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.