Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26988903›Full record

ReviewJournal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research2016

Patent foramen ovale (PFO), stroke and pregnancy.

Lei Chen, Wenjun Deng, Igor Palacios, Ignacio Inglessis-Azuaje, David McMullin, Dong Zhou, Eng H Lo, Ferdinando Buonanno, MingMing Ning

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. European position paper on the management of patients with patent foramen ovale. Part II - Decompression sickness, migraine, arterial deoxygenation syndromes and select high-risk clinical conditions.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Stroke in Pregnancy: A Multidisciplinary Approach.Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Management of Maternal Stroke and Mitigating Risk.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019
    Review
  16. Secondary Headaches During Pregnancy: When to Worry.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2019
    Review
  17. Management of stroke and pregnancy.European stroke journal · 2018
    Review
  18. Causes and Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke During Pregnancy.Current treatment options in neurology · 2018
    Review
  19. Pregnancy-Associated Stroke.Journal of midwifery & women's health · 2018
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lei ChenDepartment of Neurology, Cardio-Neurology Clinic, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Neurology, West China Hospital in Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Wenjun DengDepartment of Neurology, Cardio-Neurology Clinic, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Igor PalaciosDepartment of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ignacio Inglessis-AzuajeDepartment of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David McMullinDepartment of Neurology, Cardio-Neurology Clinic, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Dong ZhouDepartment of Neurology, West China Hospital in Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Eng H LoDepartment of Neurology, Cardio-Neurology Clinic, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Ferdinando BuonannoDepartment of Neurology, Cardio-Neurology Clinic, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
MingMing NingDepartment of Neurology, Cardio-Neurology Clinic, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · USHarvard University · USWest China Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

Proteomic Profiling of Patent Foramen Ovale Related Neurovascular InjuryR01NS067139 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NING, MINGMING · 2010 to 2023
$3.7M
Thrombolysis Profiles in tPA ResponseR01NS093415 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI LO, ENG H., NING, MINGMING · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS067139NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS093415
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patent foramen ovale (PFO)-related stroke is increasingly recognized as an important etiology of ischemic embolic stroke-accounting for up to 50% of strokes previously considered 'cryptogenic' or with an unknown mechanism. As a 'back door to the brain,' PFO can allow venous clots to enter arterial circulation via interatrial right-to-left shunting, potentially resulting in ischemic stroke. We observe that clinically, PFO-related stroke affects women of childbearing age, and that pregnancy-owing to major changes in hemocoagulative, hormonal, and cardiovascular parameters-can enhance stroke risks. However, no systematic study has been performed and little is known regarding complications, pregnancy outcomes and treatment for PFO-related stroke during pregnancy. To identify and characterize the complications and clinical outcomes related to PFOs during pregnancy, we performed a literature review and analysis from all reported cases of pregnancy with PFO-related complications in the medical literature from 1970 to 2015. We find that during pregnancy and post-partum, PFO is associated with complications affecting multiple organs, including the brain, heart and lung. The three principal complications reported are stroke, pulmonary emboli and myocardial infarction. In contrast to other pregnancy-related stroke etiologies, which peak during later pregnancy and postpartum, PFO-related stroke peaks during early pregnancy (first and second trimester-60%), and most patients had good neurological outcome (77%). In patients with PFO with recurrent stroke during pregnancy, additional key factors include high-risk PFO morphology (atrial septal aneurysm), larger right-to-left shunt, multiple gestation and concurrent hypercoagulability. Compared to strokes of other etiologies during pregnancy, most PFO stroke patients experienced uneventful delivery (93%) of healthy babies with a good clinical outcome. We conclude with recommended clinical treatment strategies for pregnant patients with PFO suggested by the data from these cases, and the clinical experience of our Cardio-Neurology Clinic.

Indexed as

Age FactorsFemaleForamen Ovale, PatentHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsStrokeMyocardial InfarctionPregnancyPulmonary EmbolismStroke

Identifiers

PMID26988903
PMCPMC6083869
OpenAlexW2306891597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.