ArticleSurgery today2016
Efficacy and hemodynamic response of pleural carbon dioxide insufflation during thoracoscopic surgery in a swine vessel injury model.
Article in Surgery today, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Positive Intrapleural Pressure with Carbon Dioxide May Limit Intraoperative Pulmonary Arterial Bleeding: Verification by Animal Model.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2022Article
- Profiles of intraoperative complications in robot-assisted anatomical pulmonary resection for lung cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- Intraoperative air leak site detection in spontaneous pneumothorax through carbon dioxide insufflation during thoracoscopic surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Article
- Catastrophes and complicated intraoperative events during robotic lung resection.Journal of visualized surgery · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposesThoracoscopic anatomical lung resection is a minimally invasive technique, but intraoperative massive bleeding is a critical complication. We investigated the hemostatic efficacy and safety of intrapleural carbon dioxide (CO
methodsSwines were assigned to one of four groups subjected to thoracoscopic surgery under target intrathoracic pressures of 0, 5, 10, or 15 mmHg CO
resultsThere were no signs or echographic findings of air embolus. Both the blood loss per minute and total blood loss during the experiment were significantly lower in the 10 and 15 mmHg groups than in the 0 mmHg group (p > 0.05, respectively). The hemodynamic signs, including heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and peripheral oxygen saturation, were not significantly different in the 0 and 10 mmHg groups at most times, although they were significantly correlated with the insufflation pressure during the experiments (p < 0.05).
conclusionsCO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.