Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26988710›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity2016

Modified ground-truthing: an accurate and cost-effective food environment validation method for town and rural areas.

Caitlin Eicher Caspi, Robin Friebur

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. INTEGRATING MULTIPLE BUILT ENVIRONMENT DATA SOURCES.The annals of applied statistics · 2023
    Article
  9. Urban-rural disparities in childhood obesogenic environments in the United States: Application of differing rural definitions.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Healthy Diets in Rural Victoria-Cheaper than Unhealthy Alternatives, Yet Unaffordable.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Caitlin Eicher CaspiDepartment of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Program in Health Disparities Research, 717 Delaware St. SE, Minneapolis, MN, 55414, USA. cecaspi@umn.edu.
Robin FrieburNutrition Policy Institute, University of California Berkeley, 2115 Milvia Street, Suite 3, Berkeley, CA, 94704, USA.

Funding

Cancer Related Health Disparities Training ProgramT32CA163184 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MICHELE L ALLEN, Irina Stepanov · 2016 to 2026
$3.4M
Cancer Related Health Disparities Education and Career Development ProgramR25CA163184 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI FORSTER, JEAN, OKUYEMI, KOLAWOLE S · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA163184NCI NIH HHS R25CA163184NCI NIH HHS T32 CA163184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA major concern in food environment research is the lack of accuracy in commercial business listings of food stores, which are convenient and commonly used. Accuracy concerns may be particularly pronounced in rural areas. Ground-truthing or on-site verification has been deemed the necessary standard to validate business listings, but researchers perceive this process to be costly and time-consuming. This study calculated the accuracy and cost of ground-truthing three town/rural areas in Minnesota, USA (an area of 564 miles, or 908 km), and simulated a modified validation process to increase efficiency without comprising accuracy. For traditional ground-truthing, all streets in the study area were driven, while the route and geographic coordinates of food stores were recorded.

resultsThe process required 1510 miles (2430 km) of driving and 114 staff hours. The ground-truthed list of stores was compared with commercial business listings, which had an average positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.57 and sensitivity of 0.62 across the three sites. Using observations from the field, a modified process was proposed in which only the streets located within central commercial clusters (the 1/8 mile or 200 m buffer around any cluster of 2 stores) would be validated. Modified ground-truthing would have yielded an estimated PPV of 1.00 and sensitivity of 0.95, and would have resulted in a reduction in approximately 88 % of the mileage costs.

conclusionsWe conclude that ground-truthing is necessary in town/rural settings. The modified ground-truthing process, with excellent accuracy at a fraction of the costs, suggests a new standard and warrants further evaluation.

Indexed as

CommerceEnvironmentFood SupplyCost-Benefit AnalysisData CollectionFoodHumansMinnesotaRural PopulationUrban PopulationValidation Studies as TopicAccuracyCost-effectivenessFood environmentGround-truthingValidation

Identifiers

PMID26988710
PMCPMC4794836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.