Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26988554›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Anterior versus posterior debridement fusion for single-level dorsal tuberculosis: the role of graft-type and level of fixation on determining the outcome.

Yasser M Assaghir, Hesham Hamed Refae, Mohamed Alam-Eddin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Short-term effectiveness of anterior and middle columns repair and reconstruction with whole autogenous spinous process-laminar bone through posterior approach in thoracolumbar tuberculosis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Osteotomized debridement versus curetted debridement in posterior approach in treating thoracolumbar tuberculosis: a comparative study.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasser M AssaghirOrthopaedic Department, Sohag Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohâg, 82425, Egypt. youryaser@yahoo.com.
Hesham Hamed RefaeOrthopaedic Department, Qena Faculty of Medicine, Qena University, Qena, 98379, Egypt.
Mohamed Alam-EddinOrthopaedic Department, Sohag Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohâg, 82425, Egypt.
Sohag University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study compared the clinical, radiological and functional outcome of anterior versus posterior approaches for single-level dorsal tuberculosis with analysis of effect of graft type and fixation level on the outcome.

methodsAnterior group (AG): 43 cases (mean age: 49.5 years) fixed with Z-plate by anterior transthoracic-transpleural approach. Posterior group (PG): 49 cases (47.0 years) fixed with transpedicular-screws with unilateral facetectomy ± pediculectomy. Assessment was done using Frankel classification, blood-loss, operative-time, Kyphus-angle, correction loss, union and Oswestry disability index (ODI).

resultsBoth groups had similar operative-time, blood-loss, time to union, follow-up, and hospital-stay. Kyphus-angle improved from 36.6 ± 8.4° to 7.5 ± 2.3° (AG) and from 38.5 ± 5.9° to 11.1 ± 3.6° (PG) and this was significant. Postoperative Kyphus-angles were significantly better than preoperative ones in both groups. The correction percentage was 79.2 % (AG) and 69.9 % (PG) and this was significant. ODI was 3.4 ± 4.1 (AG) and 3.0 ± 4.2 % (PG) and this was insignificant. Correction loss was .8 ± 1.2° (AG) and 1.9 ± 2.2° (PG) and this was significant. Union was faster with iliac graft but with lower correction degree and higher correction loss than rib-strut graft. All patients achieved union. All but three patients achieved full neurological recovery. Superficial infection occurred in three cases (PG:2; AG:1) lung parenchymal injury in two case (AG), and DVT in one case (AG).

conclusionsBoth approaches give very good union and kyphosis correction rate that were maintained overtime. Anterior approach gives statistically better kyphosis correction and less correction-loss, but this is clinically insignificant. Besides, it is more risky and difficult. Strut-graft is essential in reconstruction and correction of kyphosis and vertebral height. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III therapeutic.

Indexed as

DebridementAdultBone PlatesHumansMiddle AgedOperative TimeTreatment OutcomeTuberculosis, SpinalAnterior Z-plateKyphus angle Oswestry disability indexPosterior debridement fusionRetrospective comparative studySingle-level tuberculosis dorsal spine

Identifiers

PMID26988554
OpenAlexW2304741528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.