ArticleJournal of ovarian research2016
Fertility-sparing surgery for young patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs): single institution experience.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Fertility preservation in rare ovarian malignancies: a decade-spanning systematic review of menstrual and reproductive outcomes.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2025Pooled it
- Salpingo-oophorectomy versus cystectomy in patients with borderline ovarian tumors: a systemic review and meta-analysis on postoperative recurrence and fertility.World journal of surgical oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Unilateral cystectomy and serous histology are associated with relapse in borderline ovarian tumor patients with fertility-sparing surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2020Pooled it
- Fertility-Sparing Management in Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of women's health · 2026Review
- Impact of ovarian cystectomy on oncological and reproductive outcomes in borderline ovarian tumors: a retrospective study from a tertiary center.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in borderline ovarian tumor and ovarian cancer: a retrospective comparative study.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Article
- Oncofertility outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in infertile BOT patients: results of a large retrospective study on controlled ovarian stimulation.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Laparoscopic Fertility-Sparing Management of Borderline Ovarian Tumors: Surgical and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Successful delivery after in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in a woman with metachronous primary cancer of ovary and endometrium: a case report.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Reproductive Results in Cancer Survivors after Fertility Sparing Management: The Need for the Standardization of Definitions.Cancers · 2023Review
- Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of 91 Patients with Seromucinous and Mucinous Borderline Ovarian Tumors: a Comparative Study.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023Article
- Predictive features of borderline ovarian tumor recurrence in patients with childbearing potential undergoing conservative treatment.Molecular and clinical oncology · 2022Article
- Identification of clinical and molecular features of recurrent serous borderline ovarian tumour.EClinicalMedicine · 2022Article
- Neuroendocrine Tumors: Clinical, Histological and Immunohistochemical Perspectives and Case Report-Mature Teratoma in a 16-Year-Old Girl.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2021Article
- Ultraconservative, Fertility Sparing Treatment of Bilateral Borderline Ovarian Tumors: A Case Report of a 26-Year-Old, 0-Gravida with an Endometrioid Borderline Ovarian Tumor of the Right Ovary and a Sero-Mucinous Borderline Ovarian Tumor of the Left Ovary and a Review of the Literature.International journal of women's health · 2020Article
- Outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery for stage II and III serous borderline ovarian tumors.The Journal of international medical research · 2019Article
- The impact of clinicopathologic and surgical factors on relapse and pregnancy in young patients (≤40 years old) with borderline ovarian tumors.BMC cancer · 2018Article
- Age-dependent difference in impact of fertility preserving surgery on disease-specific survival in women with stage I borderline ovarian tumors.Journal of ovarian research · 2018Article
- Identification of factors that impact recurrence in patients with borderline ovarian tumors.Journal of ovarian research · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFertility-sparing surgery for patients with borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the oncological safety and fertility benefits in conservative surgery,as well as efficiency of surgical procedures and approaches.
resultsIn total 122 patients with BOTs, four types of fertility-sparing surgery were performed: unilateral adnexectomy (UA, n = 47), unilateral cystectomy (UC, n = 59), unilateral adnexectomy + contralateral cystectomy (UA + CC, n = 7) and bilateral cystectomy (BC, n = 9). Fifty-two (42.6 %) patients had undergone laparoscopy, while 70 (57.4 %) had undergone laparotomy. After a median follow-up of 58.0 months, eight patients (6.6 %) relapsed in average of 25.9 months. Only one patient progressed to invasive cancer. None died within our observational period. Univariate analysis showed that patients with elevated CA125, bilateral tumors, extra-ovary tumor or mucinous type tended to replase in shorter time (p < 0.05). Among all cases, 45 patients attempted to conceive and 34 (75.6 %) patients had successful pregnancy. The recurrence rates were successively increased (2.1 %, 6.8 %, 14.3 %, and 22.2 %), the recurrence interval were shortened (48.0, 25.3, 26.0 and 21.2 months) and the subsequent fertility rates were 76.9 %, 77.3 %, 66.7 % and 71.4 % in UA, UC, UA + CC, and BC groups, respectively. As for surgical approaches, three patients (5.8 %) relapsed in 26.3 months in the laparoscopy group and five (7.1 %) in 25.5 months in the laparotomy group. The subsequent fertility rate was higher in laparoscopy group (88.9 %) than in laparotomy group (66.7 %). In our study, 38 patients underwent staging surgery. Two patients (5.3 %) recurrent in average of 21.0 months, and the subsequent pregnancy rate of staging surgery group was 61.5 %. Twelve patients received adjuvant chemotherapy but they didn't get any benefit from it, both in term of recurrence (8.3 %, 26.0 months) and subsequent pregnancy rate (75.5 %).
conclusionFertility-sparing surgery is safe and beneficial for most young BOTs. UA through laparoscopy should be recommended as the first choice. To the patients with bilateral tumors, elevated CA125, extra-ovary tumor or mucinous type, conservative surgery should be carefully chosen and subsequent pregnancy should be attempted in short term. In addition, the benefit of comprehensive surgical staging is to be further investigated and adjuvant chemotherapy is not recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.