Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26988441›Full record

ArticleTrends in cell biology2016

p73 and FoxJ1: Programming Multiciliated Epithelia.

Peter K Jackson, Laura D Attardi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in cell biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Building the right centriole for each cell type.The Journal of cell biology · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Forkhead Box Protein J1 (FOXJ1) is Overexpressed in Colorectal Cancer and Promotes Nuclear Translocation of β-Catenin in SW620 Cells.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peter K JacksonStanford University School of Medicine, Baxter Laboratory, Departments of Microbiology and Immunology and Pathology, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: pjackson@stanford.edu.
Laura D AttardiStanford University School of Medicine, Department of Radiation Oncology and Department of Genetics, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Ciliary Signaling Controlling Obesity and Metabolic DiseaseR01GM121565 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, PETER KENT · 2017 to 2025
$4.3M
Centriolar-ciliary signaling mechanisms in tissue regeneration and differentiationR01GM114276 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI JACKSON, PETER KENT · 2015 to 2018
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114276NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mysteriously diverse phenotypes in mice lacking the p53 homolog p73 are recently unified by new analysis showing p73 is required for formation of multiciliated epithelia. p73 directly activates FoxJ1, the central transcriptional driver for multiciliation, and induces a host of genes critical for ciliogenesis.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalAnimalsCell PolarityCiliaEpithelial CellsEpitheliumForkhead Transcription FactorsGenotypeHumansMiceMice, KnockoutPhenotypePhosphoproteinsSignal TransductionTrans-ActivatorsTranscription, GeneticForkhead Transcription FactorsFOXJ1 protein, mousePhosphoproteinsTrans-ActivatorsTrp63 protein, mouseTrp73 protein, mouseTumor Protein p73differentiationmulticiliated epitheliap53p63p73Primary cilia

Identifiers

PMID26988441
PMCPMC5555749
OpenAlexW2300633895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.