Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26988367›Full record

Trial reportBMC cancer2016

Randomised controlled trial of a home-based physical activity intervention in breast cancer survivors.

Ian M Lahart, George S Metsios, Alan M Nevill, George D Kitas, Amtul R Carmichael

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC cancer, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02408107 (Randomised Controlled Trial of a Home-based Physical Activity Intervention in Breast Cancer Survivors), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 18 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 18 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02408107 phase3completednot on this map

Randomised Controlled Trial of a Home-based Physical Activity Intervention in Breast Cancer Survivors

TypeinterventionalSponsorDudley Group NHS Foundation TrustRan2010 to 2013Enrolled80ConditionsBreast CancerArmsPhysical activity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 18 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. The Effects of Post-diagnosis Recreational Aerobic Exercise among Breast Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review/Meta-Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Effects of physical exercise on body fat and laboratory biomarkers in cancer patients: a meta-analysis of 35 randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Effects of exercise on the quality of life in breast cancer patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Pooled it
  15. Pooled it
  16. Physical activity for women with breast cancer after adjuvant therapy.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  17. Counseling interventions delivered in women with breast cancer to improve health-related quality of life: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2017
    Pooled it
  18. Pooled it
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ian M LahartFaculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall Campus, Gorway Road, Walsall, WS1 3BD, UK. i.lahart@wlv.ac.uk.
George S MetsiosFaculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall Campus, Gorway Road, Walsall, WS1 3BD, UK.
Alan M NevillFaculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall Campus, Gorway Road, Walsall, WS1 3BD, UK.
George D KitasFaculty of Education, Health and Wellbeing, University of Wolverhampton, Walsall Campus, Gorway Road, Walsall, WS1 3BD, UK.
Amtul R CarmichaelDepartment of Surgery, Russells Hall Hospital, Dudley, DY1 2HQ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo improve adherence to physical activity (PA), behavioural support in the form of behavioural change counselling may be necessary. However, limited evidence of the effectiveness of home-based PA combined with counselling in breast cancer patients exists. The aim of this current randomised controlled trial with a parallel group design was to evaluate the effectiveness of a home-based PA intervention on PA levels, anthropometric measures, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and blood biomarkers in breast cancer survivors.

methodsEighty post-adjuvant therapy invasive breast cancer patients (age = 53.6 ± 9.4 years; height = 161.2 ± 6.8 cm; mass = 68.7 ± 10.5 kg) were randomly allocated to a 6-month home-based PA intervention or usual care. The intervention group received face-to-face and telephone PA counselling aimed at encouraging the achievement of current recommended PA guidelines. All patients were evaluated for our primary outcome, PA (International PA Questionnaire) and secondary outcomes, mass, BMI, body fat %, HRQoL (Functional assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast), insulin resistance, triglycerides (TG) and total (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) cholesterol were assessed at baseline and at 6-months.

resultsOn the basis of linear mixed-model analyses adjusted for baseline values performed on 40 patients in each group, total, leisure and vigorous PA significantly increased from baseline to post-intervention in the intervention compared to usual care (between-group differences, 578.5 MET-min∙wk(-1), p = .024, 382.2 MET-min∙wk(-1), p = .010, and 264.1 MET-min∙wk(-1), p = .007, respectively). Both body mass and BMI decreased significantly in the intervention compared to usual care (between-group differences, -1.6 kg, p = .040, and -.6 kg/m(2), p = .020, respectively). Of the HRQoL variables, FACT-Breast, Trial Outcome Index, functional wellbeing, and breast cancer subscale improved significantly in the PA group compared to the usual care group (between-group differences, 5.1, p = .024; 5.6, p = .001; 1.9 p = .025; and 2.8, p = .007, respectively). Finally, TC and LDL-C was significantly reduced in the PA group compared to the usual care group (between-group differences, -.38 mmol∙L(-1), p = .001; and -.3 mmol∙L(-1), p = .023, respectively).

conclusionsWe found that home-based PA resulted in significant albeit small to moderate improvements in self-reported PA, mass, BMI, breast cancer specific HRQoL, and TC and LDL-C compared with usual care. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02408107 (March 25, 2015).

Indexed as

ExerciseAdolescentAdultBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurvivorsBreast neoplasmsPhysical activityRandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID26988367
PMCPMC4797234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.