Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26988231›Full record

Trial reportTrials2016

Room temperature stable carbetocin for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage during the third stage of labour in women delivering vaginally: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Mariana Widmer, Gilda Piaggio, Hany Abdel-Aleem, Guillermo Carroli, Yap-Seng Chong, Arri Coomarasamy, Bukola Fawole, Shivaprasad Goudar, G Justus Hofmeyr, Pisake Lumbiganon and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Prophylactic use of ergot alkaloids in the third stage of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 13 institutions in 12 countries.

Mariana WidmerDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1201, Switzerland. widmerm@who.int.
Gilda PiaggioMedical Statistics deparment, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Hany Abdel-AleemDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women's Health Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt.
Guillermo CarroliCentro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales, Rosario, Argentina.
Yap-Seng ChongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University Hospital Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Arri CoomarasamyBirmingham Women's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Bukola FawoleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Shivaprasad GoudarDepartment of Medical Education, K L E Society's J N Medical College, Belgaum, India.
G Justus HofmeyrEffective Research Care Unit, University of Witwatersrand, University of Fort Hare, East London, South Africa.
Pisake LumbiganonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.
Kidza MugerwaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Thi My Huong NguyenDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1201, Switzerland.
Zahida QureshiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Kenyatta National Hospital, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Joao Paulo SouzaDepartment of Social Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
A Metin GülmezogluDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, UNDP/UNFPA/UNICEF/WHO/World Bank Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (HRP), Avenue Appia 20, Geneva, 1201, Switzerland.
World Health Organization · CHAssiut University · EGBirmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust · GBCentro Rosarino de Estudios Perinatales · ARKenyatta National Hospital · KEKhon Kaen University · THLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMakerere University · UGNational University Hospital · SGSarojini Naidu Medical College · INUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversity of Fort Hare · ZAUniversity of Ibadan · NG

Funding

Department of Health HTA/14/139/17World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality in low-income countries and contributes to nearly a quarter of maternal deaths globally. The current available interventions for prevention of postpartum haemorrhage, oxytocin and carbetocin, are limited by their need for refrigeration to maintain potency, as the ability to maintain a cold chain across the drug distribution and storage network is inconsistent, thus restricting their use in countries with the highest burden of maternal mortality. We describe a randomized, double-blind non-inferiority trial comparing a newly developed room temperature stable formulation of carbetocin to the standard intervention (oxytocin) for the prevention of PPH after vaginal birth. METHODS/

designApproximately 30,000 women delivering vaginally will be recruited across 22 centres in 10 countries. The primary objectives are to evaluate the non-inferiority of room temperature stable carbetocin (100 μg intramuscular) versus oxytocin (10 IU intramuscular) in the prevention of PPH and severe PPH after vaginal birth. The primary endpoints are blood loss ≥500 mL or the use of additional uterotonics (composite endpoint required by drug regulatory authorities) and blood loss ≥1,000 mL (WHO requirement). Non-inferiority will be assessed using a two-sided 95 % confidence interval for the relative risk of the above endpoints for room temperature stable carbetocin versus oxytocin. The upper limit of the two-sided 95 % confidence interval for the relative risk for the composite endpoint of blood loss ≥500 mL or the use of additional uterotonics, and for the endpoint of blood loss ≥1,000 mL, will be compared to a non-inferiority margin of 1.16 and 1.23, respectively. If the upper limit is below the corresponding margin, non-inferiority will have been demonstrated. The safety analysis will include all women receiving treatment. Safety and tolerability will be assessed by a review of adverse events, by conducting inferential testing with significance levels for between-group comparisons. DISCUSSION: If the results of the study show that room temperature stable carbetocin is a safe and effective alternative to oxytocin, this could have a substantial impact on the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage and maternal survival worldwide.

trial registrationACTRN12614000870651 (14 August 2014).

Indexed as

Labor Stage, ThirdParturitionClinical ProtocolsDelivery, ObstetricDouble-Blind MethodDrug CompoundingDrug StabilityFemaleHumansOxytocicsOxytocinPostpartum HemorrhagePregnancyResearch DesignRisk FactorsTemperaturecarbetocinOxytocicsOxytocinNon-inferiority trialOxytocinPostpartum haemorrhageRoom temperature stable carbetocin

Identifiers

PMID26988231
PMCPMC4794812
OpenAlexW2300924015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.