ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Comparison of module detection algorithms in protein networks and investigation of the biological meaning of predicted modules.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- TidyMass2: advancing LC-MS untargeted metabolomics through metabolite origin inference and metabolic feature-based functional module analysis.Nature communications · 2026Article
- The Extent of Edgetic Perturbations in the Human Interactome Caused by Population-Specific Mutations.Biomolecules · 2023Article
- Protein-protein interaction network module changes associated with the vertebrate fin-to-limb transition.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Edge and modular significance assessment in individual-specific networks.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Article
- Enlightening the molecular mechanisms of type 2 diabetes with a novel pathway clustering and pathway subnetwork approach.Turkish journal of biology = Turk biyoloji dergisi · 2022Article
- Lung disease network reveals impact of comorbidity on SARS-CoV-2 infection and opportunities of drug repurposing.BMC medical genomics · 2021Article
- Modularity in Biological Networks.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Integration of anatomy ontology data with protein-protein interaction networks improves the candidate gene prediction accuracy for anatomical entities.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Article
- Systems Pharmacogenomic Landscape of Drug Similarities from LINCS data: Drug Association Networks.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Functional homogeneity and specificity of topological modules in human proteome.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- MTGO: PPI Network Analysis Via Topological and Functional Module Identification.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- CommWalker: correctly evaluating modules in molecular networks in light of annotation bias.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Identification of a gene signature for discriminating metastatic from primary melanoma using a molecular interaction network approach.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Knowledge-based biomedical Data Science.EPJ data science · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is generally acknowledged that a functional understanding of a biological system can only be obtained by an understanding of the collective of molecular interactions in form of biological networks. Protein networks are one particular network type of special importance, because proteins form the functional base units of every biological cell. On a mesoscopic level of protein networks, modules are of significant importance because these building blocks may be the next elementary functional level above individual proteins allowing to gain insight into fundamental organizational principles of biological cells.
resultsIn this paper, we provide a comparative analysis of five popular and four novel module detection algorithms. We study these module prediction methods for simulated benchmark networks as well as 10 biological protein interaction networks (PINs). A particular focus of our analysis is placed on the biological meaning of the predicted modules by utilizing the Gene Ontology (GO) database as gold standard for the definition of biological processes. Furthermore, we investigate the robustness of the results by perturbing the PINs simulating in this way our incomplete knowledge of protein networks.
conclusionsOverall, our study reveals that there is a large heterogeneity among the different module prediction algorithms if one zooms-in the biological level of biological processes in the form of GO terms and all methods are severely affected by a slight perturbation of the networks. However, we also find pathways that are enriched in multiple modules, which could provide important information about the hierarchical organization of the system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.