ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2016
Anti-Mitotic Spindle Apparatus Antoantibodies: Prevalence and Disease Association in Chinese Population.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Significance of Uncommon, Non-Clinical, and Novel Autoantibodies.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2024Review
- Autoantibody Profiling and Anti-Kinesin Reactivity in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Uncommon patterns of antinuclear antibodies recognizing mitotic spindle apparatus antigens and clinical associations.Medicine · 2018Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMitotic spindle apparatus (MSA) antibodies are rare findings with undefined clinical significance in clinical research. We aimed at investigating the prevalence and clinical significance of anti-MSA antibodies in Chinese population.
methodsBetween 2008 and 2013, a total of 180,180 patients were studied for the presence of anti-MSA antibodies. The clinical details and laboratory data of anti-MSA-positive patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed.
resultsOf the 180,180 patients tested, 68,640 patients presented with positive antinuclear antibodies (ANAs, 38.10%), but only 32 patients with positive anti-MSA antibodies (0.018%). Diagnoses were established in 22 of 32 patients: 16 connective tissue diseases (CTDs), mainly Sjogren syndrome (SS, 5/16), rheumatoid arthritis (RA, 4/16), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, 3/16), and 6 nonautoimmune conditions. The most frequent clinical symptoms of the anti-MSA-positive patients were arthralgia and eyes and mouth drying. Additionally, 70% of anti-MSA antibodies were not associated with other ANAs, however, when associated, the most frequent ANA was anti-SSA.
conclusionsAnti-MSA antibodies have a low prevalence and female gender predominance. Anti-MSA antibodies are primarily associated with CTDs, mainly SS, RA, and SLE. The presence of anti-MSA antibodies might be the unique serological markers of the CTDs, especially when anti-SSA, SSB, and dsDNA antibodies are negative, or the level of RF is low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.