Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26987552›Full record

ArticleMicrobiologyOpen2016

Anaerobic microbial community response to methanogenic inhibitors 2-bromoethanesulfonate and propynoic acid.

Tara M Webster, Adam L Smith, Raghav R Reddy, Ameet J Pinto, Kim F Hayes, Lutgarde Raskin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MicrobiologyOpen, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Tara M WebsterCivil & Environmental Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.ORCID 0000-0003-0063-337X
Adam L SmithCivil & Environmental Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Raghav R ReddyCivil & Environmental Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ameet J PintoInfrastructure and Environment Research Division, School of Engineering, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Kim F HayesCivil & Environmental Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Lutgarde RaskinCivil & Environmental Engineering Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
University of Michigan · USUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methanogenic inhibitors are often used to study methanogenesis in complex microbial communities or inhibit methanogens in the gastrointestinal tract of livestock. However, the resulting structural and functional changes in archaeal and bacterial communities are poorly understood. We characterized microbial community structure and activity in mesocosms seeded with cow dung and municipal wastewater treatment plant anaerobic digester sludge after exposure to two methanogenic inhibitors, 2-bromoethanesulfonate (BES) and propynoic acid (PA). Methane production was reduced by 89% (0.5 mmol/L BES), 100% (10 mmol/LBES), 24% (0.1 mmol/LPA), and 95% (10 mmol/LPA). Using modified primers targeting the methyl-coenzyme M reductase (mcrA) gene, changes in mcrA gene expression were found to correspond with changes in methane production and the relative activity of methanogens. Methanogenic activity was determined by the relative abundance of methanogen 16S rRNA cDNA as a percentage of the total community 16S rRNA cDNA. Overall, methanogenic activity was lower when mesocosms were exposed to higher concentrations of both inhibitors, and aceticlastic methanogens were inhibited to a greater extent than hydrogenotrophic methanogens. Syntrophic bacterial activity, measured by 16S rRNA cDNA, was also reduced following exposure to both inhibitors, but the overall structure of the active bacterial community was not significantly affected.

Indexed as

Alkanesulfonic AcidsAlkynesAnimalsBacteriaBase SequenceCattleDNA, ArchaealDNA, RibosomalFecesMethaneMethanosarcinalesMicrobiotaOxidoreductasesPropionatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSewage2-bromoethanesulfonic acidAlkanesulfonic AcidsAlkynesDNA, ArchaealDNA, RibosomalMethanemethyl coenzyme M reductaseOxidoreductasespropiolic acidPropionatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSewage16S rRNA2-bromoethanesulfonatemcrAmethanogenic inhibitorspropynoic acid.

Identifiers

PMID26987552
PMCPMC4985588
OpenAlexW2297207209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.