Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26987368›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2016

Engaging with community-based public and private mid-level providers for promoting the use of modern contraceptive methods in rural Pakistan: results from two innovative birth spacing interventions.

Syed Khurram Azmat, Waqas Hameed, Hasan Bin Hamza, Ghulam Mustafa, Muhammad Ishaque, Ghazunfer Abbas, Omar Farooq Khan, Jamshaid Asghar, Erik Munroe, Safdar Ali and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Syed Khurram AzmatDepartment of Urogynecology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. syedkhurram.azmat@ugent.be.
Waqas HameedMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Hasan Bin HamzaFreelance Public Health Professional, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Ghulam MustafaMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Muhammad IshaqueMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Ghazunfer AbbasMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Omar Farooq KhanMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Jamshaid AsgharMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Erik MunroeResearch, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Marie Stopes International, London, UK.
Safdar AliMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Wajahat HussainMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Sajid AliMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Aftab AhmedMarie Stopes Society, Research, Monitoring and Evaluation Department, Technical Services, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Moazzam AliDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marleen TemmermanDepartment of Urogynecology, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium.
Marie Stopes Society · PKMarie Stopes International · GBSA Health · AUWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily planning (FP) interventions aimed at reducing population growth have negligible during the last two decades in Pakistan. Innovative FP interventions that help reduce the growing population burden are the need of the hour. Marie Stopes Society--Pakistan implemented an operational research project--'Evidence for Innovating to Save Lives', to explore effective and viable intervention models that can promote healthy timing and spacing of pregnancy in rural and under-served communities of Sindh, Punjab and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provinces of Pakistan.

methodsWe conducted a quasi-experimental (pre- and post-intervention with control arm) study to assess the effectiveness of each of the two intervention models, (1) Suraj model (meaning 'Sun' in English), which uses social franchises (SF) along with a demand-side financing (DSF) approach using free vouchers, and (2) Community Midwife (CMW) model, in promoting the use of modern contraceptive methods compared to respective controls. Baseline and endline cross-sectional household surveys were conducted, 24 months apart, by recruiting 5566 and 6316 married women of reproductive age (MWRA) respectively. We used Stata version 8 to report the net effect of interventions on outcome indicators using difference-in-differences analysis. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to assess the net effect of the intervention on current contraceptive use, keeping time constant and adjusting for other variables in the model.

resultsThe Suraj model was effective in significantly increasing awareness about FP methods among MWRA by 14% percentage points, current contraceptive use by 5% percentage points and long term modern method--intrauterine device (IUD) use by 6% percentage points. The CMW model significantly increased contraceptive awareness by 28% percentage points, ever use of contraceptives by 7% percentage points and, IUD use by 3% percentage points. Additionally the Suraj intervention led to a 35% greater prevalence (prevalence ratio: 1.35, 95% CI: 1.22-1.50) of contraceptive use among MWRA.

conclusionSuraj intervention highlights the importance of embedding subsidized FP services within the communities of the beneficiaries. The outcomes of the CMW intervention also improved the use of long-term contraceptives. These findings indicate the necessity of designing and implementing FP initiatives involving local mid-level providers to expand contraceptive coverage in under-served areas.

Indexed as

Birth IntervalsCommunity NetworksContraceptionContraception BehaviorCulturally Competent CareFamily Planning PolicyFamily Planning ServicesAdultCommunity Health WorkersContraceptive Prevalence SurveysCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth ExpendituresHumansIntrauterine DevicesMidwiferyBirth spacingCommunity midwivesContraceptionFamily planningRural PakistanSurajVouchers

Identifiers

PMID26987368
PMCPMC4797360
OpenAlexW2301296002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.