Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26987073›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Determining the Lowest Optimally Effective Methotrexate Dose for Individual RA Patients Using Their Dose Response Relation in a Tight Control Treatment Approach.

Sandhya C Nair, Johannes W G Jacobs, Marije F Bakker, Z Nazira Jahangier, Johannes W J Bijlsma, Jacobs M van Laar, Floris P J G Lafeber, Paco M J Welsing, Utrecht Arthritis Cohort Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimising low-dose methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis-A review.British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  6. Drug-related problems in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2019
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sandhya C NairDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Johannes W G JacobsDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marije F BakkerDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Z Nazira JahangierDepartment of Rheumatology, Tergooi hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
Johannes W J BijlsmaDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jacobs M van LaarDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Floris P J G LafeberDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Paco M J WelsingDepartment of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Utrecht Arthritis Cohort Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the optimal methotrexate dose in individual patients and to explore whether this optimal dose and the level of disease activity at that dose could be predicted.

methodsData from CAMERA II trial comparing MTX and MTX with 10 mg of prednisone both in a tight control treatment strategy in early RA was used. For each patient a curve for disease activity over time was fitted and the MTX dose after which further step-up did not result in relevant improvement in disease activity anymore was determined the 'lowest optimally effective MTX dose (LOED)'. The association of demographic and clinical characteristics at baseline with this LOED and with the level of disease activity reached at LOED was studied.

resultsIn 204 (100 MTX and 104 MTX with prednisone) out of 236 patients LOED could be defined. 10 mg/wk was the most prevalent LOED in patients treated with MTX and prednisone and 10 mg/wk, 20 mg/wk and 30 mg/wk in the MTX strategy. Although the specific LOED could not reliably be predicted, higher baseline disease activity, height and lower weight were associated with higher LOEDs (i.e at least 15 mg/wk). A score was presented to decide on a starting dose of 10 mg/wk or (at least) 15 mg/wk. The level of disease activity at LOED could not be reliably predicted.

conclusionA starting dose of 10 mg/wk might be a good choice for most patients and is frequently already the optimal dose. However, a subgroup of patient can be determined who would require higher MTX doses.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMethotrexateMiddle AgedPrednisoneTreatment OutcomeAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntirheumatic AgentsMethotrexatePrednisone

Identifiers

PMID26987073
PMCPMC4795693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.