Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26987018›Full record

ArticleeLife2016

Nucleosomes impede Cas9 access to DNA in vivo and in vitro.

Max A Horlbeck, Lea B Witkowsky, Benjamin Guglielmi, Joseph M Replogle, Luke A Gilbert, Jacqueline E Villalta, Sharon E Torigoe, Robert Tjian, Jonathan S Weissman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 265 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
265citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
30.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

265 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 436 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. CRISPR for cystic fibrosis: Advances and insights from a systematic review.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. 3D Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/dCas Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Dual-line Genome-scale CRISPR Screening Enables Robust Target Gene Discovery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Targeted mutagenesis and base editing using engineeredPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Embedded CRISPRi Enhances Gene-Silencing Efficiency in Drosophila.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. An ATMT-CRISPR/Cas9 system for genome editing in Monascus purpureus.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026
    Article

205 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Max A HorlbeckDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Lea B WitkowskyHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.
Benjamin GuglielmiHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.
Joseph M ReplogleDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Luke A GilbertDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Jacqueline E VillaltaDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
Sharon E TorigoeHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.
Robert TjianHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, United States.
Jonathan S WeissmanDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, United States.
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · US

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007618 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ANDERSON, MARK S · 1985 to 2020
$29.6M
PROJECT 3P50GM102706 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI CATE, JAMIE H · 2012 to 2016
$9.5M
Univ of Calif Berkeley Chemistry-Biology Interface ProgramT32GM066698 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI CHANG, CHRISTOPHER J., FRANCIS, MATTHEW B · 2004 to 2023
$7.5M
Bay Area Cancer Target Discovery and Development NetworkU01CA168370 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MCCORMICK, FRANK PATRICK, MCMANUS, MICHAEL T · 2012 to 2016
$3.9M
Integrative Program in Complex Biological System (ipCBS)T32EB009383 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MARSHALL, WALLACE, WEINER, ORION D · 2009 to 2022
$3.2M
Harnessing CRISPR for Targeted and Inducible Epigenomic ReprogrammingR01DA036858 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LIM, WENDELL A, QI, LEI STANLEY · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS U01 CA168370NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB009383NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA036858NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM102706NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007618NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM066698
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prokaryotic CRISPR (clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats)-associated protein, Cas9, has been widely adopted as a tool for editing, imaging, and regulating eukaryotic genomes. However, our understanding of how to select single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) that mediate efficient Cas9 activity is incomplete, as we lack insight into how chromatin impacts Cas9 targeting. To address this gap, we analyzed large-scale genetic screens performed in human cell lines using either nuclease-active or nuclease-dead Cas9 (dCas9). We observed that highly active sgRNAs for Cas9 and dCas9 were found almost exclusively in regions of low nucleosome occupancy. In vitro experiments demonstrated that nucleosomes in fact directly impede Cas9 binding and cleavage, while chromatin remodeling can restore Cas9 access. Our results reveal a critical role of eukaryotic chromatin in dictating the targeting specificity of this transplanted bacterial enzyme, and provide rules for selecting Cas9 target sites distinct from and complementary to those based on sequence properties.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsCell LineCRISPR-Associated Protein 9DNAEndonucleasesGene TargetingHumansNucleosomesBacterial ProteinsCas9 endonuclease Streptococcus pyogenesCRISPR-Associated Protein 9DNAEndonucleasesNucleosomeschromatinchromosomesCRISPR/Casgeneshumannucleosomes

Identifiers

PMID26987018
PMCPMC4861601
OpenAlexW2304268185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.