Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26986515›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2016

p53MutaGene: an online tool to estimate the effect of p53 mutational status on gene regulation in cancer.

I Amelio, R A Knight, A Lisitsa, G Melino, A V Antonov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. p53 mutants cooperate with HIF-1 in transcriptional regulation of extracellular matrix components to promote tumor progression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

I AmelioMedical Research Council Toxicology Unit, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9126-5391
R A KnightMedical Research Council Toxicology Unit, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK.
A LisitsaInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
G MelinoMedical Research Council Toxicology Unit, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK.
A V AntonovMedical Research Council Toxicology Unit, Leicester LE1 9HN, UK.
Medical Research Council · GBInstitute of Biomedical Chemistry · RUUniversity of Rome Tor Vergata · IT

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U132670600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

p53MutaGene is the first online tool for statistical validation of hypotheses regarding the effect of p53 mutational status on gene regulation in cancer. This tool is based on several large-scale clinical gene expression data sets and currently covers breast, colon and lung cancers. The tool detects differential co-expression patterns in expression data between p53 mutated versus p53 normal samples for the user-specified genes. Statistically significant differential co-expression for a gene pair is indicative that regulation of two genes is sensitive to the presence of p53 mutations. p53MutaGene can be used in 'single mode' where the user can test a specific pair of genes or in 'discovery mode' designed for analysis of several genes. Using several examples, we demonstrate that p53MutaGene is a useful tool for fast statistical validation in clinical data of p53-dependent gene regulation patterns. The tool is freely available at http://www.bioprofiling.de/tp53.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticInternetMutationNeoplasmsSoftwareTumor Suppressor Protein p53AnimalsHumansTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53

Identifiers

PMID26986515
PMCPMC4823943
OpenAlexW2301100176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.