Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26986347›Full record

ArticlePhysical review. E2016

Low-dimensional dynamics of structured random networks.

Johnatan Aljadeff, David Renfrew, Marina Vegué, Tatyana O Sharpee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review. E, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johnatan AljadeffDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
David RenfrewDepartment of Mathematics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Marina VeguéCentre de Recerca Matemàtica, Campus de Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain.
Tatyana O SharpeeComputational Neurobiology Laboratory, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, California, USA.

Funding

Core Grant for Vision ResearchP30EY019005 · NEI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI ALBRIGHT, THOMAS D · 2009 to 2018
$7.7M
Neural mechanisms of shape perceptionR01EY019493 · NEI · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI SHARPEE, TATYANA O. · 2009 to 2013
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY019005NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019493NEI NIH HHS R01EY019493
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a generalized random recurrent neural network model, and by extending our recently developed mean-field approach [J. Aljadeff, M. Stern, and T. Sharpee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 088101 (2015)], we study the relationship between the network connectivity structure and its low-dimensional dynamics. Each connection in the network is a random number with mean 0 and variance that depends on pre- and postsynaptic neurons through a sufficiently smooth function g of their identities. We find that these networks undergo a phase transition from a silent to a chaotic state at a critical point we derive as a function of g. Above the critical point, although unit activation levels are chaotic, their autocorrelation functions are restricted to a low-dimensional subspace. This provides a direct link between the network's structure and some of its functional characteristics. We discuss example applications of the general results to neuroscience where we derive the support of the spectrum of connectivity matrices with heterogeneous and possibly correlated degree distributions, and to ecology where we study the stability of the cascade model for food web structure.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerEcological and Environmental PhenomenaNeuronsStochastic ProcessesSynapses

Identifiers

PMID26986347
PMCPMC4820296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.