Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26986112›Full record

Observational studyMedicine2016

A Novel Risk Score to the Prediction of 10-year Risk for Coronary Artery Disease Among the Elderly in Beijing Based on Competing Risk Model.

Long Liu, Zhe Tang, Xia Li, Yanxia Luo, Jin Guo, Haibin Li, Xiangtong Liu, Lixin Tao, Aoshuang Yan, Xiuhua Guo

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 7 countries.

Long LiuFrom the Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (LL, YL, JG, HL, XL, LT, AY, XG); Beijing Municipal Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, Beijing, China (LL, YL, JG, HL, XL, LT, XG); Xuan Wu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China (ZT); The Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland (XL); and Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission, Beijing, China (AY).
Zhe Tang
Xia Li
Yanxia Luo
Jin Guo
Haibin Li
Xiangtong Liu
Lixin Tao
Aoshuang Yan
Xiuhua Guo
National Natural Science Foundation of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study aimed to construct a risk prediction model for coronary artery disease (CAD) based on competing risk model among the elderly in Beijing and develop a user-friendly CAD risk score tool. We used competing risk model to evaluate the risk of developing a first CAD event. On the basis of the risk factors that were included in the competing risk model, we constructed the CAD risk prediction model with Cox proportional hazard model. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and time-dependent area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the discrimination ability of the both methods. Calibration plots were applied to assess the calibration ability and adjusted for the competing risk of non-CAD death. Net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were applied to quantify the improvement contributed by the new risk factors. Internal validation of predictive accuracy was performed using 1000 times of bootstrap re-sampling. Of the 1775 participants without CAD at baseline, 473 incident cases of CAD were documented for a 20-year follow-up. Time-dependent AUCs for men and women at t = 10 years were 0.841 [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.806-0.877], 0.804 (95% CI: 0.768-0.839) in Fine and Gray model, 0.784 (95% CI: 0.738-0.830), 0.733 (95% CI: 0.692-0.775) in Cox proportional hazard model. The competing risk model was significantly superior to Cox proportional hazard model on discrimination and calibration. The cut-off values of the risk score that marked the difference between low-risk and high-risk patients were 34 points for men and 30 points for women, which have good sensitivity and specificity. A sex-specific multivariable risk factor algorithm-based competing risk model has been developed on the basis of an elderly Chinese cohort, which could be applied to predict an individual's risk and provide a useful guide to identify the groups at a high risk for CAD among the Chinese adults over 55 years old.

Indexed as

AgedArea Under CurveBeijingCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID26986112
PMCPMC4839893
OpenAlexW2335892568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.