Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26985996›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Invariant Feature Matching for Image Registration Application Based on New Dissimilarity of Spatial Features.

Seyed Mostafa Mousavi Kahaki, Md Jan Nordin, Amir H Ashtari, Sophia J Zahra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A coarse-to-fine registration method for three-dimensional MR images.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seyed Mostafa Mousavi KahakiCenter for Artificial Intelligence Technology, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, National University of Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Md Jan NordinCenter for Artificial Intelligence Technology, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, National University of Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Amir H AshtariCenter for Artificial Intelligence Technology, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, National University of Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.
Sophia J ZahraCenter for Artificial Intelligence Technology, Faculty of Information Science and Technology, National University of Malaysia (UKM), Bangi, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An invariant feature matching method is proposed as a spatially invariant feature matching approach. Deformation effects, such as affine and homography, change the local information within the image and can result in ambiguous local information pertaining to image points. New method based on dissimilarity values, which measures the dissimilarity of the features through the path based on Eigenvector properties, is proposed. Evidence shows that existing matching techniques using similarity metrics--such as normalized cross-correlation, squared sum of intensity differences and correlation coefficient--are insufficient for achieving adequate results under different image deformations. Thus, new descriptor's similarity metrics based on normalized Eigenvector correlation and signal directional differences, which are robust under local variation of the image information, are proposed to establish an efficient feature matching technique. The method proposed in this study measures the dissimilarity in the signal frequency along the path between two features. Moreover, these dissimilarity values are accumulated in a 2D dissimilarity space, allowing accurate corresponding features to be extracted based on the cumulative space using a voting strategy. This method can be used in image registration applications, as it overcomes the limitations of the existing approaches. The output results demonstrate that the proposed technique outperforms the other methods when evaluated using a standard dataset, in terms of precision-recall and corner correspondence.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer GraphicsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPattern Recognition, AutomatedSatellite ImagerySubtraction Technique

Identifiers

PMID26985996
PMCPMC4795769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.