Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26985862›Full record

ReviewExpert review of vaccines2016

Vaccines for the prevention against the threat of MERS-CoV.

Lanying Du, Wanbo Tai, Yusen Zhou, Shibo Jiang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert review of vaccines, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Paving New Roads UsingIranian journal of pharmaceutical research : IJPR · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lanying Dua Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute , New York Blood Center , New York , NY , USA.
Wanbo Taia Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute , New York Blood Center , New York , NY , USA.
Yusen Zhoub State Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity , Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology , Beijing , China.
Shibo Jianga Lindsley F. Kimball Research Institute , New York Blood Center , New York , NY , USA.
New York Blood Center · USFudan University · CNInstitute of Microbiology · CN

Funding

Critical neutralizing domain-based vaccines against new SARS-like virus hCoV-EMCR21AI109094 · NIAID · NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER · PI DU, LANYING · 2014 to 2015
$466k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI109094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

First identified in 2012, Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) coronavirus (MERS-CoV) is listed as a new Category C Priority Pathogen. While the high mortality of MERS-CoV infection is further intensified by potential human-to-human transmissibility, no MERS vaccines are available for human use. This review explains immune responses resulting from MERS-CoV infection, describes MERS vaccine criteria, and presents available small animal models to evaluate the efficacy of MERS vaccines. Current advances in vaccine development are summarized, focusing on specific applications and limitations of each vaccine category. Taken together, this review provides valuable guidelines toward the development of an effective and safe MERS vaccine. This article is written for a Special Focus Issue of Expert Review of Vaccines on 'Vaccines for Biodefence'.

Indexed as

AnimalsCoronavirus InfectionsDisease Models, AnimalDrug DiscoveryHumansMiddle East Respiratory Syndrome CoronavirusViral VaccinesViral VaccinesAnimal modelsimmune responsesMERSMERS-CoVneutralizing antibodyprotectionspike proteinvaccines

Identifiers

PMID26985862
PMCPMC5097835
OpenAlexW2298205133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.