ArticlePloS one2016
Focal Plant Observations as a Standardised Method for Pollinator Monitoring: Opportunities and Limitations for Mass Participation Citizen Science.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- No evidence for male attraction to cephalic labial gland pheromones in Bombus terrestris (Hymenoptera: Apidae).Journal of insect science (Online) · 2026Article
- Flower-visiting assemblages of arable lands and orchards in the eastern Pannonian Lowland, studied with volatile traps.Biodiversity data journal · 2026Article
- The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Exploring Biodiversity through the Lens ofInsects · 2024Article
- Effects of study design parameters on estimates of bee abundance and richness in agroecosystems: a meta-analysis.Annals of the Entomological Society of America · 2024Review
- Mismatch between IUCN range maps and species interactions data illustrated using the Serengeti food web.PeerJ · 2023Article
- Crowd-sourced observations of a polyphagous moth reveal evidence of allochronic speciation varying along a latitudinal gradient.PloS one · 2023Article
- Camera traps are an effective tool for monitoring insect-plant interactions.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- The Potential Role of School Citizen Science Programs in Infectious Disease Surveillance: A Critical Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Review
- Community science data suggests that urbanization and forest habitat loss threaten aphidophagous native lady beetles.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Article
- Citizen science data reveals the need for keeping garden plant recommendations up-to-date to help pollinators.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Not that kind of tree: Assessing the potential for decision tree-based plant identification using trait databases.Applications in plant sciences · 2020Article
- Article
- The potential for citizen science to produce reliable and useful information in ecology.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2019Article
- Effects of Residence Time, Auto-Fertility and Pollinator Dependence on Reproductive Output and Spread of Alien and Native Asteraceae.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently there has been increasing focus on monitoring pollinating insects, due to concerns about their declines, and interest in the role of volunteers in monitoring pollinators, particularly bumblebees, via citizen science. METHODOLOGY / PRINCIPAL
findingsThe Big Bumblebee Discovery was a one-year citizen science project run by a partnership of EDF Energy, the British Science Association and the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology which sought to assess the influence of the landscape at multiple scales on the diversity and abundance of bumblebees. Timed counts of bumblebees (Bombus spp.; identified to six colour groups) visiting focal plants of lavender (Lavendula spp.) were carried out by about 13 000 primary school children (7-11 years old) from over 4000 schools across the UK. 3948 reports were received totalling 26 868 bumblebees. We found that while the wider landscape type had no significant effect on reported bumblebee abundance, the local proximity to flowers had a significant effect (fewer bumblebees where other flowers were reported to be >5m away from the focal plant). However, the rate of mis-identifcation, revealed by photographs uploaded by participants and a photo-based quiz, was high. CONCLUSIONS / SIGNIFICANCE: Our citizen science results support recent research on the importance of local flocal resources on pollinator abundance. Timed counts of insects visiting a lure plant is potentially an effective approach for standardised pollinator monitoring, engaging a large number of participants with a simple protocol. However, the relatively high rate of mis-identifications (compared to reports from previous pollinator citizen science projects) highlights the importance of investing in resources to train volunteers. Also, to be a scientifically valid method for enquiry, citizen science data needs to be sufficiently high quality, so receiving supporting evidence (such as photographs) would allow this to be tested and for records to be verified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.