Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26985604›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of public health2016

Impact of State Ignition Interlock Laws on Alcohol-Involved Crash Deaths in the United States.

Elinore J Kaufman, Douglas J Wiebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Alcohol-impaired driving among adults-USA, 2014-2018.Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention · 2022
    Article
  4. Car/Motorbike Drivers' Willingness to Use and to Pay for Alcohol Interlock in Taiwan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Drink Driving as the Commonest Drug Driving-A Perspective from Europe.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Alcohol-Impaired Driving and Perceived Risks of Legal Consequences.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elinore J KaufmanElinore J. Kaufman is a student with the Health Policy Program at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and a resident in the Department of Surgery at New York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. Douglas J. Wiebe is with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology at the University of Pennsylvania.
Douglas J WiebeElinore J. Kaufman is a student with the Health Policy Program at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, and a resident in the Department of Surgery at New York-Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY. Douglas J. Wiebe is with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology at the University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

Training in Critical Care Health Policy ResearchT32HL098054 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Scott D Halpern · 2010 to 2026
$8.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098054NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL-98054-6
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate the impact on alcohol-involved crash deaths of universal ignition interlock requirements, which aim to prevent people convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol from driving while intoxicated.

methodsWe used data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration for 1999 to 2013. From 2004 to 2013, 18 states made interlocks mandatory for all drunk-driving convictions. We compared alcohol-involved crash deaths between 18 states with and 32 states without universal interlock requirements, accounting for state and year effects, and for clustering within states.

resultsPolicy impact was apparent 3 years after implementation. The adjusted rate of alcohol-involved crash deaths was 4.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.0, 5.4) per 100,000 in states with the universal interlock requirement, compared with 5.5 (95% CI = 5.48, 5.53) in states without, an absolute reduction of 0.8 (95% CI = 0.1, 1.5) deaths per 100,000 per year.

conclusionsRequiring ignition interlocks for all drunk-driving convictions was associated with 15% fewer alcohol-involved crash deaths, compared with states with less-stringent requirements. Interlocks are a life-saving technology that merit wider use.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficAge DistributionBreath TestsDriving Under the InfluenceHumansProtective DevicesRegression AnalysisResidence CharacteristicsTime FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26985604
PMCPMC4985097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.