ArticleBiology of sport2016
Sports genetics: the PPARA gene and athletes' high ability in endurance sports. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Biology of sport, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Genes and Elite Marathon Running Performance: A Systematic Review.Journal of sports science & medicine · 2019Pooled it
- The Role of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and Their Transcriptional Coactivators Gene Variations in Human Trainability: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Pooled it
- Protective Effect of Amino Acids on the Muscle Injury of Aerobics Athletes after Endurance Exercise Based on CT Images.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Trial
- Genes and Injuries in Sports: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of human kinetics · 2026Review
- Review
- Review
- Article
- Genetic Determinants of Endurance: A Narrative Review on Elite Athlete Status and Performance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The relationships between ACTN3 rs1815739 and PPARA-α rs4253778 gene polymorphisms and athletic performance characteristics in professional soccer players.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Genes and Athletic Performance: The 2023 Update.Genes · 2023Review
- Association ofGenes · 2023Article
- Article
- The Effect of Selected Polymorphisms of theGenes · 2022Article
- Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) and Antioxidants as Immunomodulators in Exercise: Implications for Heme Oxygenase and Bilirubin.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Genetic characteristics of competitive swimmers: a review.Biology of sport · 2022Review
- Review
- PPARPPAR research · 2021Article
- Whole Genome Interpretation for a Family of Five.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Genetic test for the personalization of sport training.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
unlabelledA meta-analysis was performed with the aim of re-evaluating the role of the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARA) gene intron 7 G/C polymorphism (rs4253778) in athletes' high ability in endurance sports.
designA meta-analysis of case control studies assessing the association between the G/C polymorphisms of the PPARA gene and endurance sports was conducted. The Cochrane Review Manager software was used to compare the genotype and allele frequencies between endurance athletes and controls to determine whether a genetic variant is more common in athletes than in the general population. Five studies, encompassing 760 endurance athletes and 1792 controls, fulfilled our inclusion criteria. The pooled odds ratio (and confidence intervals, CIs) for the G allele compared to the C allele was 1.65 (95% CI 1.39-1.96). The pooled OR for the GG genotype compared to the GC genotype was 1.79 (95% CI 1.44-2.22), and for the GG genotype compared to the CC genotype 2.37 (95% CI 1.40-3.99). There was no evidence of heterogeneity (I(2) =0%) or of publication bias. Athletes with high ability in endurance sports had a higher frequency of the GG genotype and G allele.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.