ReviewThe Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry2017
Plasticity of Sensorimotor Networks: Multiple Overlapping Mechanisms.
Review in The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Cerebellar Activity Affects Distal Cortical Physiology and Synaptic Plasticity in a Human Parietal-Motor Pathway Associated with Motor Actions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Altered brain dynamics in chronic neck and shoulder pain revealed by hidden Markov model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Switching neuron contributions to second network activity.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Network Reorganization for Neurophysiological and Behavioral Recovery Following Stroke.Central nervous system agents in medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Breast Cancer: How Hippotherapy Bridges the Gap between Healing and Recovery-A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.Cancers · 2023Article
- The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Brain networks and their relevance for stroke rehabilitation.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2019Review
- A Preliminary Comparison of Motor Learning Across Different Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms Shows No Consistent Modulations.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- Longitudinal Structural and Functional Differences Between Proportional and Poor Motor Recovery After Stroke.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Redundancy is an important feature of the motor system, as abundant degrees of freedom are prominent at every level of organization across the central and peripheral nervous systems, and musculoskeletal system. This basic feature results in a system that is both flexible and robust, and which can be sustainably adapted through plasticity mechanisms in response to intrinsic organismal changes and dynamic environments. While much early work of motor system organization has focused on synaptic-based plasticity processes that are driven via experience, recent investigations of neuron-glia interactions, epigenetic mechanisms and large-scale network dynamics have revealed a plethora of plasticity mechanisms that support motor system organization across multiple, overlapping spatial and temporal scales. Furthermore, an important role of these mechanisms is the regulation of intrinsic variability. Here, we review several of these mechanisms and discuss their potential role in neurorehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.