Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26985034›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Sensory Prioritization in Rats: Behavioral Performance and Neuronal Correlates.

Conrad C Y Lee, Mathew E Diamond, Ehsan Arabzadeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Neuromodulation of Brain State and Behavior.Annual review of neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Cortical States of Wakefulness.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Conrad C Y LeeEccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, The Australian National University Node, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia, and.
Mathew E DiamondAustralian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, The Australian National University Node, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia, and International School for Advanced Studies, SISSA-ISAS, Trieste 34100, Italy.
Ehsan ArabzadehEccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia, Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Integrative Brain Function, The Australian National University Node, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia, and Ehsan.arabzadeh@anu.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Operating with some finite quantity of processing resources, an animal would benefit from prioritizing the sensory modality expected to provide key information in a particular context. The present study investigated whether rats dedicate attentional resources to the sensory modality in which a near-threshold event is more likely to occur. We manipulated attention by controlling the likelihood with which a stimulus was presented from one of two modalities. In a whisker session, 80% of trials contained a brief vibration stimulus applied to whiskers and the remaining 20% of trials contained a brief change of luminance. These likelihoods were reversed in a visual session. When a stimulus was presented in the high-likelihood context, detection performance increased and was faster compared with the same stimulus presented in the low-likelihood context. Sensory prioritization was also reflected in neuronal activity in the vibrissal area of primary somatosensory cortex: single units responded differentially to the whisker vibration stimulus when presented with higher probability compared with lower probability. Neuronal activity in the vibrissal cortex displayed signatures of multiplicative gain control and enhanced response to vibration stimuli during the whisker session. In conclusion, rats allocate priority to the more likely stimulus modality and the primary sensory cortex may participate in the redistribution of resources. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Detection of low-amplitude events is critical to survival; for example, to warn prey of predators. To formulate a response, decision-making systems must extract minute neuronal signals from the sensory modality that provides key information. Here, we identify the behavioral and neuronal correlates of sensory prioritization in rats. Rats were trained to detect whisker vibrations or visual flickers. Stimuli were embedded in two contexts in which either visual or whisker modality was more likely to occur. When a stimulus was presented in the high-likelihood context, detection was faster and more reliable. Neuronal recording from the vibrissal cortex revealed enhanced representation of vibrations in the prioritized context. These results establish the rat as an alternative model organism to primates for studying attention.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsAttentionDecision MakingExploratory BehaviorMaleNeuronsPhysical StimulationPsychophysicsRatsRats, Long-EvansReaction TimeSignal Detection, PsychologicalSomatosensory CortexTime FactorsVibrissaeattentionawake-recordingbarrel cortexbehaviorextracellularsensory coding

Identifiers

PMID26985034
PMCPMC6705526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.