Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26984994›Full record

ArticleFamily practice2016

The Chronic Disease Self-Management Program: the experience of frequent users of health care services and peer leaders.

Catherine Hudon, Maud-Christine Chouinard, Fatoumata Diadiou, Danielle Bouliane, Mireille Lambert, Émilie Hudon

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Family practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Complexities of care: Common components of models of care in geriatrics.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Catherine HudonDépartement de Médecine de Famille et de Médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Québec, catherine.hudon@usherbrooke.ca.
Maud-Christine ChouinardCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Saguenay, Québec and Département des Sciences de la Santé, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Saguenay, Québec, Canada.
Fatoumata DiadiouCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Saguenay, Québec and.
Danielle BoulianeCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Saguenay, Québec and.
Mireille LambertCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean, Saguenay, Québec and.
Émilie HudonDépartement des Sciences de la Santé, Université du Québec à Chicoutimi, Saguenay, Québec, Canada.
Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean · CACentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke · CAUniversité du Québec à Chicoutimi · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge amount of evidence supports the contribution of the Stanford Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP) to a global chronic disease management strategy. However, many studies have suggested further exploring of the factors influencing acceptance and completion of participants in this program.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe and examine factors associated with acceptance and completion rates of the CDSMP among frequent users of health care services, and to highlight the experience of patients and peer leaders who facilitated the program.

methodsA descriptive design with mixed sequential data was used. Acceptance and completion rates were calculated and their relationship with patient characteristics was examined in regression analysis (n = 167). Interviews were conducted among patients who accepted (n = 11) and refused (n = 13) to participate and with the program coordinator. Focus groups were held with the seven peer leaders who facilitated the program. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsOf the 167 patients invited, 60 (36%) accepted to participate in the program. Group format was the most frequent reason to decline the invitation to participate. Twenty-eight participants (47%) completed the program. Participants who dropped out during the program raised different reasons such as poor health and too much heterogeneity among participants. Factors such as location, schedule, content, group composition and facilitation were considered as important elements contributing to the success of the program.

conclusionThe CDSMP could therefore be considered as a self-management support option for this vulnerable clientele, while taking measures to avoid too much heterogeneity among participants to improve completion rates.

Indexed as

Disease ManagementAdultAgedChronic DiseaseCommunity Health ServicesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProgram EvaluationSelf CareSocial SupportChronic diseasefrequent usersmixed-methodprimary health careprogram evaluationself-managementStanford.support group

Identifiers

PMID26984994
PMCPMC4793803
OpenAlexW2304952531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.