ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016
Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, and Burkholderia pseudomallei by Use of Laser Light Scattering Technology.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Activities of the Novel Bacterial Topoisomerase Inhibitor OSUAB-0284 against the Biothreat PathogenACS infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Rapid antifungal phenotypic detection ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Genetic basis of clarithromycin resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- Study of Laser Light Scattering Methods in Rapid Viability Assessment of Microorganisms under Antibiotics Exposure for Adaptation in Lab-on-A-Chip Format.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Efficacy of Treatment with the Antibiotic Novobiocin against Infection withAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Bioinformatic Assessment of Factors Affecting the Correlation between Protein Abundance and Elongation Efficiency in Prokaryotes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Beating the Bio-Terror Threat with Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing.Microorganisms · 2021Review
- Modern Tools for Rapid Diagnostics of Antimicrobial Resistance.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Review
- Rapid Detection of Genetic Engineering, Structural Variation, and Antimicrobial Resistance Markers in Bacterial Biothreat Pathogens by Nanopore Sequencing.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Identification and Antibiotic-Susceptibility Profiling of Infectious Bacterial Agents: A Review of Current and Future Trends.Biotechnology journal · 2019Review
- A Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test for DeterminingFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing and β-lactam-induced cell morphology changes of Gram-negative biological threat pathogens by optical screening.BMC microbiology · 2018Article
- Rapid Antibiotic Susceptibility Determination for Yersinia pestis Using Flow Cytometry Spectral Intensity Ratio (SIR) Fluorescence Analysis.Journal of fluorescence · 2018Article
- Emerging Microtechnologies and Automated Systems for Rapid Bacterial Identification and Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing.SLAS technology · 2017Article
- Rapid Filter-Based Detection and Culture of Burkholderia pseudomallei from Small Volumes of Urine.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
- Optical Screening for Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and for Observation of Phenotypic Diversity among Strains of the Genetically Clonal Species Bacillus anthracis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2017Article
- Rapid Phenotypic Detection of Microbial Resistance in Gram-Positive Bacteria by a Real-Time Laser Scattering Method.Frontiers in microbiology · 2017Article
- Current and emerging techniques for antibiotic susceptibility tests.Theranostics · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rapid methods to determine antimicrobial susceptibility would assist in the timely distribution of effective treatment or postexposure prophylaxis in the aftermath of the release of bacterial biothreat agents such as Bacillus anthracis, Yersinia pestis, or Burkholderia pseudomallei Conventional susceptibility tests require 16 to 48 h of incubation, depending on the bacterial species. We evaluated a method that is based on laser light scattering technology that measures cell density in real time. We determined that it has the ability to rapidly differentiate between growth (resistant) and no growth (susceptible) of several bacterial threat agents in the presence of clinically relevant antimicrobials. Results were available in <4 h for B. anthracis and <6 h for Y. pestis and B. pseudomallei One exception was B. pseudomallei in the presence of ceftazidime, which required >10 h of incubation. Use of laser scattering technology decreased the time required to determine antimicrobial susceptibility by 50% to 75% for B. anthracis, Y. pestis, and B. pseudomallei compared to conventional methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.