Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26984881›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2016

Distinguishing characteristics of stem cells derived from different anatomical regions of human degenerated intervertebral discs.

Hai Wang, Yue Zhou, Tong-Wei Chu, Chang-Qing Li, Jian Wang, Zheng-Feng Zhang, Bo Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Dynamics of CD44Scientific reports · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. [Research progress of endogenous repair strategy in intervertebral disc].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hai WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
Yue ZhouDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
Tong-Wei ChuDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
Chang-Qing LiDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
Jian WangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
Zheng-Feng ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China.
Bo HuangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, People's Republic of China. bighuang2000@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSeveral types of stem cells have been successfully demonstrated to exist in the human degenerated intervertebral disc (IVD), which is composed of annulus fibrosus (AF), nucleus pulposus (NP) and cartilage endplate (CEP). However, the differences in the biological characteristics among these and bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs) remain unclear. MATERIALS AND

methodsTo investigate this issue, cells were harvested from human AF, NP, CEP, and bone marrow, respectively; passage 2 cells were selected using the agarose suspension culture system to obtain stem cell clones. Following expansion in vitro, stem cells from different anatomical regions were compared regarding the morphology, proliferation ability, immunophenotypic expression, and multi-lineage differentiation capacity. In addition, stem cell-alginate bead compositions were constructed for the comparison of DNA and sGAG content.

resultsThere were subtle differences regarding cell morphology, but no significant differences in proliferation ability among the four types of stem cells. For the immunophenotypic analysis, all stem cells basically fulfilled the criteria for mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), which have been published by the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT), with a significant difference in CD105 expression. A comparison of the osteogenic capacities indicated: cartilage endplate-derived stem cells (CESCs) > annulus fibrosus-derived stem cells (AFSCs) > BM-MSCs > nucleus pulposus-derived stem cells (NPSCs). The chondrogenesis difference was similar to osteogenesis. For adipogenesis: BM-MSCs >NPSCs >CESCs >AFSCs. In the stem cell/alginate composition, the CESCs consistently showed the superior chondrogenic potential among all those cell types.

conclusionsOur data indicated that all the four types of stem cells shared some similar biological properties (regarding shape, proliferation ability and immunophenotypic expression). CESCs, which had the strongest osteogenic and chondrogenic potentials, may serve as excellent seed cells for NP/cartilage or bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

Intervertebral Disc DegenerationCells, CulturedHumansIntervertebral DiscStem CellsBiological characteristicsComparisonIntervertebral discTissue-specific stem cells

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.