Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26984642›Full record

ArticleMolecular diagnosis & therapy2016

Novel Approach for Clinical Validation of the cobas KRAS Mutation Test in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

Abha Sharma, Guili Zhang, Shagufta Aslam, Karen Yu, Melody Chee, John F Palma

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular diagnosis & therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00113763 (An Open-label, Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trial of ABX-EGF Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00113763 phase3completednot on this map

An Open-label, Randomized, Phase 3 Clinical Trial of ABX-EGF Plus Best Supportive Care Versus Best Supportive Care in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2004 to 2009Enrolled463ConditionsColorectal Cancer, MetastasesArmsBest supportive care, Panitumumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cancer Incidence Relation to Heavy Metals in Soils of Kyzylorda Region of Kazakhstan.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Journal of pathology and translational medicine · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abha SharmaMedical Affairs Department, Roche Molecular Systems, 4300 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA, 94588, USA.
Guili ZhangMedical Affairs Department, Roche Molecular Systems, 4300 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA, 94588, USA.
Shagufta AslamMedical Affairs Department, Roche Molecular Systems, 4300 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA, 94588, USA.
Karen YuMedical Affairs Department, Roche Molecular Systems, 4300 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA, 94588, USA.
Melody CheeMedical Affairs Department, Roche Molecular Systems, 4300 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA, 94588, USA.
John F PalmaMedical Affairs Department, Roche Molecular Systems, 4300 Hacienda Drive, Pleasanton, CA, 94588, USA. john.palma@roche.com.
Materials Systems (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimOur objective was to assess the performance of the cobas test versus comparators for KRAS mutation status and predicting clinical response to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

methodsmCRC samples from 398 patients from Roche study NO16968 (XELOXA) and 82 supplemental samples were tested with the cobas(®) KRAS mutation test (cobas test), the therascreen(®) KRAS RGQ PCR kit test (therascreen test), and Sanger sequencing as the reference method for detecting mutations in codons 12/13.

resultsFor 461 eligible samples, the cobas test, therascreen test, and sequencing had invalid results for 5.2, 10.8, and 2.6 % of specimens, respectively. Valid cobas and therascreen test results had similar KRAS mutation-positive rates (37.3 vs. 36.3 %, respectively); sequencing was 28.5 %. Positive and negative percent agreement (PPA/NPA) between the cobas test and sequencing was 96.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 92.2-98.8), and 88.7 % (95 % CI 84.7-91.8), respectively. PPA/NPA between the cobas and therascreen tests was 93.3 % (95 % CI 88.1-96.3) and 96.5 % (95 % CI 93.5-98.1), respectively. Bridging analysis from NCIC-CO.17 and NCT00113763 using the cobas test yielded modeled hazard ratios for overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) of 0.558 (95 % CI 0.422-0.752) and 0.413 (95 % CI 0.304-0.550), respectively, for cetuximab and 0.989 (95 % CI 0.778-1.299) and 0.471 (95 % CI 0.360-0.626), respectively, for panitumumab, demonstrating significant efficacy in the KRAS-negative population for PFS.

conclusionThe cobas test showed similar accuracy to the therascreen test for detecting KRAS mutations and could appropriately identify mCRC patients ineligible for anti-EGFR therapy as demonstrated by bridging analysis results.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsColorectal NeoplasmsDNA Mutational AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingProtein Kinase Inhibitorsras ProteinsReagent Kits, DiagnosticReproducibility of ResultsAntineoplastic AgentsProtein Kinase Inhibitorsras ProteinsReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID26984642
PMCPMC4879158
OpenAlexW2301468370

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.