Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26984618›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2017

Towards an open, collaborative, reusable framework for sharing hands-on bioinformatics training workshops.

Nathan S Watson-Haigh, Jerico Revote, Radoslaw Suchecki, Sonika Tyagi, Susan M Corley, Catherine A Shang, Annette McGrath

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathan S Watson-HaighAustralian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics (ACPFG), University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, Australia.
Jerico RevoteMonash Bioinformatics Platform, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Radoslaw SucheckiAustralian Centre for Plant Functional Genomics (ACPFG), University of Adelaide, PMB 1, Glen Osmond, Australia.
Sonika TyagiOncogenomics Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Susan M CorleySystems Biology Initiative, School of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Catherine A ShangSchool of Biomedical Sciences and the Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Annette McGrathThe Genome Analysis Centre, Norwich, ELIXIR, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, UK, The Swedish University for Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada, Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, Netherlands Bioinformatics Centre, Department of Bioinformatics, Radboud Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands, CSC - IT Center for Science Ltd., Espoo, Finland, Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, MIT, Cambridge, MA, USA, CSIRO, Bioinformatics Core, Canberra, Australia, The Sainsbury Laboratory, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1 Rue Michel Servet, Genève, Switzerland, Academis, Illstrasse 12, Berlin, Germany, The Nowgen Centre, 29 Grafton Street, Manchester, UK, Department of Physics, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy, The Roslin Institute, Edinburgh, UK and The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a clear demand for hands-on bioinformatics training. The development of bioinformatics workshop content is both time-consuming and expensive. Therefore, enabling trainers to develop bioinformatics workshops in a way that facilitates reuse is becoming increasingly important. The most widespread practice for sharing workshop content is through making PDF, PowerPoint and Word documents available online. While this effort is to be commended, such content is usually not so easy to reuse or repurpose and does not capture all the information required for a third party to rerun a workshop. We present an open, collaborative framework for developing and maintaining, reusable and shareable hands-on training workshop content.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyCooperative BehaviorHumansbioinformatics; training; workshop; reusable; collaborative; open access

Identifiers

PMID26984618
PMCPMC5444239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.